On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:52:32AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Olav Vitters wrote:
> >3. That we tried to blackmail someone
> if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck..
> >4. That it is about sysvinit scripts
> Again, of course it is.
> >If you cannot, it seems you just performed
svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
>This is incredible, 90+ postings are from the pro systemd people. Are
>you afraid of something? Where do the other side of view speak up. Seems
Indeed, it looks like that systemd users are seriously underrepresented
in these threads:
https://qa.debian.org/popcon-g
Svante Signell wrote:
Hi,
This is incredible, 90+ postings are from the pro systemd people. Are
you afraid of something? Where do the other side of view speak up. Seems
like the same thing happening again when the default init system was
chosen, the more loudly the more strength in affecting peo
Hi,
This is incredible, 90+ postings are from the pro systemd people. Are
you afraid of something? Where do the other side of view speak up. Seems
like the same thing happening again when the default init system was
chosen, the more loudly the more strength in affecting peoples opinions.
Keep on,
Hi,
Josh Triplett:
> Well, *that's* useful; thanks! I previously had the impression that
> systemd did not support this at all.
>
Also see systemd-nspawn(1), a chroot-on-steroids which can "boot" an
entire subdirectory (like the result of 'debootstrap') without messing
around with /usr/sbin/poli
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> j...@joshtriplett.org:
> > Personally, I'd actually love to see a port of systemd (a *complete*
> > port of systemd) to be capable of running in system mode without being
> > PID 1.
>
> Why would you need to port it?
> You can do that today quite easily; just say "systemd
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:56:33AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
All this talk about what upstream developers will and won't do.
Seems to me that they've been writing sysvinit scripts for years;
systemd support ADDS work. It's only the GNOME developers who are
being rather vo
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 03:21:51PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Josh Triplett (2014-10-25 11:52:28)
> > Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> Quoting Josh Triplett (2014-10-24 16:27:27)
> >>> Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> On 24 October 2014 13:33, Ansgar Burchardt
> wrote:
> > I don't
Hi,
j...@joshtriplett.org:
> Personally, I'd actually love to see a port of systemd (a *complete*
> port of systemd) to be capable of running in system mode without being
> PID 1.
Why would you need to port it?
You can do that today quite easily; just say "systemd --system".
I have no idea what
Hi,
Josh Triplett:
> There's a reason that systemd has had a meteoric adoption rate: it
> provides a huge number of features people not only want, but have wanted
> for years.
>
Or didn't even know they wanted. Or simply didn't have *time* to implement
a workaround for. The integrated logging whi
Quoting Josh Triplett (2014-10-25 11:52:28)
> [Please CC me on replies; I'm not subscribed to -vote, so for mails not
> CCed to me, I end up responding via the archives and manually quoting
> via copy/paste.]
>
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting Josh Triplett (2014-10-24 16:27:27)
>>> Aigars Mahi
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2014 à 14:47 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> There
> have been, are and will be people with different requirements that
> systemd does not and will not satisfy.
>
> Which requirements are not satisfied by systemd? I’m pretty sure the
> upstream sy
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:56:33AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> All this talk about what upstream developers will and won't do.
> Seems to me that they've been writing sysvinit scripts for years;
> systemd support ADDS work. It's only the GNOME developers who are
> being rather vocal about not s
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:51:04AM +0300, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> On 24 October 2014 23:16, wrote:
> > I'd personally be interested in your non-devil's-advocate reasons for
> > caring, because
> > those seem likely to be solvable.
>
> I, personally, love the init part of systemd - the part tha
[Please CC me on replies; I'm not subscribed to -vote, so for mails not
CCed to me, I end up responding via the archives and manually quoting
via copy/paste.]
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Josh Triplett (2014-10-24 16:27:27)
> > Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> >> On 24 October 2014 13:33, Ansgar Burc
15 matches
Mail list logo
