Re: General Resolution: Diversity statement

2012-05-09 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx , 2012-05-08, > 23:28: > >http://www.debian.org/vote/2012/vote_002 > > Hmm. According to this page, the proposal[0] was seconded by Steve > Langasek. However, Steve seconded only the draft[1], which has > different

Re: General Resolution: Diversity statement

2012-05-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx , 2012-05-08, 23:28: http://www.debian.org/vote/2012/vote_002 Hmm. According to this page, the proposal[0] was seconded by Steve Langasek. However, Steve seconded only the draft[1], which has different wording. [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-vo

Re: [Call for seconds] GR: diversity statement for the Debian Project

2012-05-09 Thread Mònica Ramírez Arceda
I think I'm late but... > TEXT TO BE VOTED STARTS HERE > > The Debian Project welcomes and encourages participation by everyone. > > No matter how you identify yourself or how others perceive you: we > welcome you. We welcome contributions from everyone as long as they > interact constru

Re: General Resolution: Diversity statement

2012-05-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Stefano Zacchiroli , 2012-05-09, 00:15: considering that the resolution procedure already takes into account "make changes to correct minor errors (for example, typographical errors or inconsistencies) or changes which do not alter the meaning, providing noone objects within 24 hours", The

Re: General Resolution: Diversity statement

2012-05-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:21:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Hi all, > > I hope that our constitution has the answer to that question. If a GR needed > self-locking dispositions, that would go against the idea of having a > constitution at all. My personal opinion is that for things that