Hello,
[switching to debian-project]
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:57 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
>
> Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
> package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
>
> How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
This fir
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:39:46PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> I'm not sure why you think so, but I do acknowledge that this
> is a hard thing to implement.
Not wishing to oversimplify, this kind of strategy carries a
high risk of conditioning the horse to walk *only* if there's a
carr
[ Apologies for this late/out of time answer, I'll try hard to make this
the last time I bother the -vote-rs :-) ]
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:38AM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
> package, more architectures, more Desktops
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:38AM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> Hello dear candidates,
>
> Debian project raise it's expectation every year: higher quality, more
> package, more architectures, more Desktops, etc... (cool).
>
> How do we face the challenge to do more every year?
As Marge also m
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 06:47:53AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Agreed, but would you agree that it is a core part of the role of the
> DPL/2IC, or indeed any mediator, to provide at least basic status and
> progress info to the project as a whole?
>
> What we've been seeing with this issue is that
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 09:57:35AM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> There isn't just Manoj that work on Manoj's packages (QA team, Security
> team, Derivative distro... and our users!)
They can use standard interfaces to modify the package, should they want
to. Manoj does the same.
> BTW, does Mano
6 matches
Mail list logo
