Hello Bernhard and everybody,
I think that the ‘RPM hell’ that you used to comment my propositions is more
related to a situation when independant distributions are using the same
package format, than when a distribution offers multiple repositories that obey
to a policy that keeps the whole syste
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:52:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:19:20PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Bearing in mind:
> > * www.debian.org/social_contract says Debian's "priorities are our
> > users and free software",
> > * popcon.debian.org currently reports
> * Did you or do you plan to talk to DAM/Frontdesk about membership changes?
Discussion must be public from the start. DAM/Frontdesk is contribution
essential. Your position will be first in the discussion's summary.
> * Do you need to come up with a GR to change membership procedures, or is
>
Hi Charles,
thanks for you long answer. But unfortunately I feel like a journalist now,
instead of getting a short *answer* to my questions, I got a looong talk around
them. So here are they again, in a very simplified form:
* Did you or do you plan to talk to DAM/Frontdesk about membership chang
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
> The exciting potential of dpkg source v3 to me is that it potentially
> opens an area that had stifled most innopvation, by allowing subtypes of
> the source format to be developed. But this area is still relatively
> closed to innovation; dpkg's maintainers
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:52:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I note Steve points out:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:06:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/123481/index.html
>
> which cites estimates of 6-8 million Ubuntu users, for a factor of
> between
Le Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 02:06:44PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > If I am elected DPL, I will re-open the discussion and lead them in a way
> > that
> > maximises everybody's contribution, for instance by making pauses if
> > necessary,
> > and by posting neutral su
Charles Plessy wrote:
> If I am elected DPL, I will re-open the discussion and lead them in a way that
> maximises everybody's contribution, for instance by making pauses if
> necessary,
> and by posting neutral summaries. After the discussion reaches conclusion, I
> will initiate a GR.
When did
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:52:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 09:49:47PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Then we can look at the official mirrors logs
> > (for distinct IPs regularly downloading package indexes in a given time
> > window), and at the same index down
9 matches
Mail list logo
