Toni Mueller dijo [Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:27:57AM +0100]:
> > What would be different if there was no leader? Where would the
> > project lose more? Would it gain in some aspect?
>
> I am not a candidate, but I can immediately see that the press would
> take the voice of "random DDs" as the voice
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> What would be different if there was no leader? Where would the
> project lose more? Would it gain in some aspect?
The Constitution gives the DPL a number of duties that would then be
vacant. Even though it wouldn't necessarily lead to total
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I have a question to the candidates: History has shown that DPLs more
> or less disappear not too long after their period or at least reduce
> their visible efforts immensly. I wonder where you see the reasons for
> this trend, what your i
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hmm, you got me thinking here on why this happened, as I share your
> impression. Maybe it was because the project as a whole put more care
> into the release process after the massive pain it was to release
> Sarge, a three-year-long pain we
Le Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:13:23AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> What do you think of this and would you be ready to withdraw a delegation
> for a delegate that behaved badly towards another DD (even outside of his
> delegated role), that has been warned once by you and that did it again
>
Hi Yavor!
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:49:16PM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> This asset is not something to be proud of because of shallow
> marketing reasons -- it benefits the whole Free World as many bugs are
> uncovered, reported, and fixed, quite often by Debian people. It
> would not be incor
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:02:56AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> By the way, I would like to react to one of Wouter's comment, that package
> maintainers should fix the porting bugs themselves.
I didn't mean to imply that, and if it came across as such, I would like
to apologise.
What I meant to
[ quoted text reordered ]
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:32:22PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> (Yes, quite a hypothetical question. However, if 10-year predictions
> are allowed, then mine is too ;-) )
Well, let's not drift too much in that direction, shall we? :-)
(Just kidding, this question is perfe
Le Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:49:16PM +0200, Yavor Doganov a écrit :
>
> * There should be an entitiy within the project to decide which arch
> gets released and which not, which one is blocking the whole release
> process and ought to be ignored for testing propagation, etc.
> Naturally, such
Le Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:17:06AM +0700, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> Which project and external Debian-related communications media do you
> follow? and contribute to? As well as a general list I'm interested in
> specific lists (for eg #debian, #debian-devel, debian-de...@l.d.o,
> debian-proj...@l.d
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:49:16PM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Debian has been known through the years for its excellent support for
> many architectures. In theory, a released arch should be as stable as
> the common/popular archs. (In practice, it is/was pretty close, which
> is good enough.)
Debian has been known through the years for its excellent support for
many architectures. In theory, a released arch should be as stable as
the common/popular archs. (In practice, it is/was pretty close, which
is good enough.)
This asset is not something to be proud of because of shallow
market
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:58:42AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> DPLs continue to be volunteers and as such they can be hit by any kind
> of time demands from their job, their personal life, etc. Probably, the
> fact that they are in a central position, which is expected to
> communicate a lot
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:30:03AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I have a question to the candidates: History has shown that DPLs more
> or less disappear not too long after their period or at least reduce
> their visible efforts immensly. I wonder where you see the reasons for
> this trend, what
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:01:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Nobody can do a sponsored upload, except a DD. Nobody can do an NMU,
> except a DD. Nobody can maintain a buildd host, except a DD.
It was pointed out to me on IRC that yes, there are sponsored NMUs, and
that it therefore is 'stran
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:56:56PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hmm, you got me thinking here on why this happened, as I share your
> impression. Maybe it was because the project as a whole put more care
> into the release process after the massive pain it was to release
> Sarge, a three-year-long p
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:32:22PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> So, today is April 15, and our Secretary prepares for a very difficult
> announcement: There is a majority of votes for NOTA. Or we didn't
> reach quorum. Or whatever you fancy - But the result is, none of the
> four candidates won the
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:56:58PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dijo [Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 01:45:33AM +0100]:
> > The numbers are easy. The amount of Debian Developers has been
> > approximately steady at about 1000 for the past ten years. Over that
> > same time, the amount of packa
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:56:56PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dijo [Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:57:13AM +0100]:
> > In my opinion, the best release we ever had (that I was a part of, at
> > least) was the Etch release process; shortly after Sarge had been
> > released, the release mana
* Charles Plessy [100317 01:52]:
> I propose that we reshape the sections and priorities of our archive, so that
> it is easy to remove from Testing any RC bug that is not in a core pakcage,
> and is old and not tagged RFH.
How is that different from the current procedure?
> In parallel, I propo
Hi,
On Tue, 16.03.2010 at 22:32:22 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> As per Constitution 5.2.4, the vote should be repeated, as many times
> as needed. Lets just assume it was different: The project has voted
> not to have a leader anymore.
>
> What would be different if there was no leader? Where wo
21 matches
Mail list logo
