Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:28:01AM +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
>> And who in their right mind do you expect to vote for ignoring DFSG
>> non-freeness, people that want to leave the project?
>
> For the record, I will not answer in this thread to other posts that are
> insult
Le Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:28:01AM +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
>
> And who in their right mind do you expect to vote for ignoring DFSG
> non-freeness, people that want to leave the project?
For the record, I will not answer in this thread to other posts that are
insulting, question people's mental
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:42:07AM +, MJ Ray a écrit :
>> Charles Plessy
> H> > Le Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:56:36PM +, MJ Ray a écrit :
Charles Plessy
> According to our social contract, “We promise that the Debian system and
> all
> its components
Le Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:42:07AM +, MJ Ray a écrit :
> Charles Plessy
H> > Le Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:56:36PM +, MJ Ray a écrit :
> > > Charles Plessy
> > > > According to our social contract, “We promise that the Debian system
> > > > and all
> > > > its components will be free accord
Charles Plessy
> Le Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:56:36PM +, MJ Ray a écrit :
> > Charles Plessy
> > > According to our social contract, “We promise that the Debian system and
> > > all
> > > its components will be free according to [the DFSG].” [...]
> >
> > Wow, that's a twist. So how do you g
Le Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:56:36PM +, MJ Ray a écrit :
> Charles Plessy
>
> > According to our social contract, “We promise that the Debian system and all
> > its components will be free according to [the DFSG].” My understanding of
> > this
> > is that the Debian system, our binary packages
Charles Plessy
> [...] my personal conclusion that this time could be
> better spent for other efforts. I therefore propose to make these
> practices optional. Since it is a major change in our traditions, I propose
> to make a GR to make sure that there is a consensus.
As will become clear, I di
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> I'm not saying I agree or disagree, but does this really really really
> need a GR?
If it could be arranged, a way to avoid the GR would be to have the
ftpmasters publicly express (ideally in this discussion thread) their
position in agreement with one of Charles's prop
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:47:41PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> a significant part of the time dedicated to make and update Debian packages is
> spent in making an exhaustive inventory of the copyright attributions of the
> distributed work, and to clean the upstream original sourc
Please sign your message if you want to propose a GR.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Dear all,
a significant part of the time dedicated to make and update Debian packages is
spent in making an exhaustive inventory of the copyright attributions of the
distributed work, and to clean the upstream original sources from files that
have no impact on the binary packages we distribute. Af
11 matches
Mail list logo
