2009/8/11 Josselin Mouette
> [deletia]
>
> I do not trust a majority of people – regardless of the people – to make
> an appropriate managerial decision. We have people in charge, who take a
> lot of time to remain informed of the status of various subsystems in
> Debian so that they can make inf
On Tue, Aug 11 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 11 août 2009 à 15:08 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>> Perhaps you should look at this less confrontationally. The vote
>> is a non-binding recommendation, it is an information gathering vote
>> where people provide feedback to t
Le mardi 11 août 2009 à 15:08 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> Perhaps you should look at this less confrontationally. The vote
> is a non-binding recommendation, it is an information gathering vote
> where people provide feedback to the release team; by voting for the
> option that b
This one time, at band camp, Anthony Towns said:
> Any thoughts? We could have such a vote over and done in about two weeks,
> with the DPL's consent, and it'd seem a lot more inclusive and less
> cabal-tastic than how things seem to be working atm...
Is there some reason we need something as heav
On Tue, Aug 11 2009, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Anthony Towns dijo [Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:07:33PM +1000]:
>> So, with August almost half-way over, I guess the release team's not
>> going to be doing much more to seek input from non-key teams/developers.
>>
>> I still think it'd be interesting and use
Anthony Towns dijo [Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:07:33PM +1000]:
> So, with August almost half-way over, I guess the release team's not
> going to be doing much more to seek input from non-key teams/developers.
>
> I still think it'd be interesting and useful to get broader input,
> though. Something l
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:14:10AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Forking devotee at this point seems to serve little purpose,
> given that upstream is not hostile.
>
Given that the secretary team haven't heared of these patches (AFAIK),
the mention of 'forking' is a bit of a over-reac
On Tue, Aug 11 2009, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Tue Aug 11 10:12, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>> Personally I don't think we should do a GR to recommend a freeze or release
>> date.
>> We already used the DPL election to push a release, when it was *long* due,
>> but
>> I don't think we should
On Tue Aug 11 10:12, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Personally I don't think we should do a GR to recommend a freeze or release
> date.
> We already used the DPL election to push a release, when it was *long* due,
> but
> I don't think we should push a freeze.
Zack has been patching devotee to al
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 05:39:23AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 07:28:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
About freeze timing we think that DebConf should definitely not fall
into a freeze
We noticed that releases in the first quarter of the year
worked o
10 matches
Mail list logo
