On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:29:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I was thinking of setting up a FAQ.
>
> .oO( Why not a Debian package?, then you would gain BTS support, and
> maybe people can help with software maintenance more
Hi,
The current devotee package is far too wedded to the Debian way
of doing things to be useful as a package. It is far too inglexible,
and things have ben h a r d c o d e d.
I have a devotee-ng in a rewrite now, that is far more modular,
and, critically, composable -- so t
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:35:51PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Also, something on my wishlist (and the wishlist of others) for years,
> has been a "poll system", which could be used during heated discussions
> to get an idea of what the silent majority thinks.
> Unfortunately, apparently the sec
On 14/04/09 at 10:48 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:29:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I was thinking of setting up a FAQ.
>
> .oO( Why not a Debian package?, then you would gain BTS support, and
> maybe people can help with software maintenance more easily ... )
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:29:22PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I was thinking of setting up a FAQ.
.oO( Why not a Debian package?, then you would gain BTS support, and
maybe people can help with software maintenance more easily ... )
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ P
5 matches
Mail list logo
