On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > > Well, because it is in line with the questions which they have been
> > > asked and its both a good chance to see weither they stand on a similar
> > > point
> > > as I do and to see weither anyone is interested in the idea
On 22/03/09 at 23:53 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> I have to disapprove on a proposal whose purpose is essentially to
> disfranchise developers from their right related to general resolutions.
> General resolutions are a m
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:09:43 +
Sam Kuper wrote:
> 2009/3/22 Josselin Mouette
>
> > And should anyone appreciate the fact that FTP masters are wasting
> > valuable developer time and putting pressure on people to the point
> > they resign from maintaining critical packages?
>
> Anyhow, let'
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:59:34AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> That's a fair question, but AUIU, it is not up to the proposer, having
> already proposed, to decide when the vote gets called.
>
It's up to the proposer or any of the seconders to do so.
Neil
--
hermanr_: I never studied german
I
Bill Allombert writes:
> I have to disapprove on a proposal whose purpose is essentially to
> disfranchise developers from their right related to general
> resolutions.
This proposed change disenfranchises no-one; no-one's rights are
deprived. It does not discriminate and treats all DDs equally
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:53:02PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> The first GR was passed in June 2003 and there were 804 developers.
> The last GR was passed in November 2008 and there were 1018 developers.
>
Actually, to be fair, the first vote was 1999, with 357 developers.
Neil
--
< vorlon>
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Hi,
I have to disapprove on a proposal whose purpose is essentially to
disfranchise developers from their right related to general resolutions.
General resolutions are a much more democratic and mature processes to handle
conflicts t
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 09:56:20PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > PROPOSAL START
> >
> > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requi
> PROPOSAL START
>
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> to initiate one are too small.
>
> Therefore the Debian projec
Je serai absent(e) à partir du 16/03/2009 de retour le 23/03/2009.
Pour toute demande de VRou de coefficient veuillez faire suivre vos
demandes à l'une des personnes suivantes:
- Virginie Duforest
- Féguy Farouil
- Sylvain Lemonnier
- Gilberte Melan
Pour les autres demandes, j'y répondrais dès
Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 16:09 +, Sam Kuper a écrit :
> If that pressure stems from a concern that without proper license
> information, Debian users/developers/etc could face legal action, then
> I, for one, as a Debian user, appreciate it.
>
Hint #1: the complete list of copyright holders
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> su, 2009-03-22 kello 17:01 +0100, Luk Claes kirjoitti:
>> I think we first have to think about what a member, if we need different
>> types of access/members and what they would be before thinking about the
>> process(es) to become a member. I do think for instance that
>> c
su, 2009-03-22 kello 17:01 +0100, Luk Claes kirjoitti:
> I think we first have to think about what a member, if we need different
> types of access/members and what they would be before thinking about the
> process(es) to become a member. I do think for instance that
> contributers who spend a lot
2009/3/22 Josselin Mouette
> And should anyone appreciate the fact that FTP masters are wasting
> valuable developer time and putting pressure on people to the point they
> resign from maintaining critical packages?
If that pressure stems from a concern that without proper license
information,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 04:27:22PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [second try, this with mutt instead of tin]
> In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de>
> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
> [...]
> > PROPOSAL START
> >
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> la, 2009-03-21 kello 01:42 +, Steve McIntyre kirjoitti:
>> P.S. Damn, just read Zack's answer and we don't seem to differ very
>> much. Oh well... :-)
>
> Dear Zack McIntyre, Steve Claes, and Luk Zacchiroli,
>
> What's your opinion on membership procedures?
>
> Last y
Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 14:55 +0100, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
> The original discussion isn't even half over and you come running to us
> screaming GR. Way to abuse our constitution and waste everyone's time.
>
> Not appreciated. Not at all.
And should anyone appreciate the fact that FTP ma
[second try, this with mutt instead of tin]
In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de>
(gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
[...]
> PROPOSAL START
>
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debi
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:35:32PM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 15:49 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
>
> > PROPOSAL START
> >
> > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > Pr
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:39:13PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de>
> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
> [...]
> > PROPOSAL START
> >
> > General Resolutions are an im
On 11697 March 1977, Neil McGovern wrote:
> AMENDMENT START
>
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> to initiate one are
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> as per Constitution 4.1.3, I am proposing the following General
> Resolution.
The original discussion isn't even half over and you come running to us
screaming GR. Way to abuse our constitution and waste everyone's time.
Not appreciated. Not at al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de>
(gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
[...]
> PROPOSAL START
>
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the D
Hi,
Thanks for bringing this GR. I'd like to propose an amendment:
AMENDMENT START
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
to i
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > I expressly refrained to answer your mail because it targetted the DPL
> > candidate but IMO it's one those "false good ideas until you make it a
> > reality". I'm all for a team of many people improving the base packages,
> > so find those people
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:25:11AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 01:11:58PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 01:43:16PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > > > What do you think about such a prop
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 01:11:58PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 01:43:16PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > > What do you think about such a proposal?
> >
> > Why are you asking the DPL candidates what they think of t
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 08:04:36PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 08:36:24PM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> > On 2009-03-21 19:20 (+0100), Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >
> > > If you need to understand the rationale, please read the thread on
> > > debian-devel with "Sponso
28 matches
Mail list logo
