Robert Millan wrote:
> OTOH, if you just tell me to "go elsewhere", I'm sorry but I don't want to
> look the other way while the project destroys its reputation for having a
> commitment to freedom, a democratic system and a set of principles.
The only one who works on destroying the project at t
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Robert Millan [Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:22:58 +0100]:
>
>> Currently, the only solution I see is that we ask the developers what they
>> think, and hold another vote.
>
> Yes, I'm realizing myself there is not going to be another way. :-(
>
> Proposal: hand Robert Millan
Robert Millan writes ("Re: Results of the Lenny release GR"):
> Actually, I accept the outcome of the last vote. I don't like that we made
> an exception for firmware, but the developers chose to make one so there's no
> point in arguing about it.
>
> On the other hand, it appears that the Secret
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 07:13:57PM +0100, Michael Goetze wrote:
>> Robert Millan wrote:
>> > - Even if there's a general perception that everyone agrees not to delay
>> > Lenny at all costs, this should definitely be voted on and sanctioned.
>> > Not doing so crea
Robert Millan writes:
> So, I'll stop now. Do not think this means the problem just got
> "solved". I only do it because I expect we can have a healthy
> discussion about it after Lenny is released.
>
> Best wishes to everyone,
Thank you. Sincerely. I think this will mean we can have a bette
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:35:22AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> How about you going elsewhere until Lenny is released, then coming back
> as soon as that happens and start working on what is left to fix then?
> (Not right before a release, right after a release for a change.)
>
A VERY BIG +1
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:37:28PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 09:26:20PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > We're having a serious discussion, and you guys are adding noise. If you
> > > want to make jokes, please at least start a separate thread.
> ...
> That goes for
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> He's doing more than interpret the results. He claims they are ambigous,
> and that his "interpretation" is based on his speculation on what he thinks
> the developers want.
No, instead of whining and acusing people you should try t
8 matches
Mail list logo
