On Sat, 03 Jan 2009, Chris Waters wrote:
> Part of the problem is that we never have "no, just no" on our
> ballots, so the only alternative is to vote "further discussion",
> even if you have no interest whatsoever in any further discussion,
> and, as far as you're concerned, the matter is settled
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:17:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > (Don has, after subsequent argument, modified this to “… that
> > you don't plan on ranking above Further Discussion”.)
>
> Bad, bad idea! What if you are planning to rank "Further Discussio
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:50:21PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Adeodato Simó [090101 23:36]:
> > No. In my opinion, an option in the ballot is (should be) a very scarce
> > resource. Like you would in a situation of limited water supply in a
> > boat shared with friends, you should act res
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:17:28AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> (Don has, after subsequent argument, modified this to “… that
> you don't plan on ranking above Further Discussion”.)
Bad, bad idea! What if you are planning to rank "Further Discussion"
as 1, but staill have a compromise you'd be wil
[I see that we're now repeating discussions already had up-list, so this
will probably be my last post to this subthread.]
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:08:47AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Nor is it anything short of absurd for the Secretary to declare that a
> > resolution amends a Foundat
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 16:59 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > When you say he was asserting a power that was not his, what exactly are
> > you saying? I'm having trouble understanding. It is unquestionably the
> > Secretary's job to prepare the ballot and announce the results; this
> > requires th
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2009, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Don Armstrong wrote:
> > If an option can't get seconds enough to pass K (or Q), it doesn't
> > have support in the DD population or the proposers are lazy, and don't
> > want to find enough support. In either case, people's time shouldn't
> > be wasted wit
7 matches
Mail list logo
