Hi,
Is it just me or is that web page completely broken?
It lists Proposer, and then Amendment Proposer, and then Seconds.
Which seconds are those, to the first or the second part?
Then finally we get Text. Wow, it took only three PgDns to get to the actual
subject matter :P :(
And then after t
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:59:37PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>Le Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:52:01PM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:05:54PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> >Le Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:57:06AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
>> >> With approximately 60 ho
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:05:54PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>Le Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:57:06AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
>> With approximately 60 hours remaining, 142 people have voted, out of a
>> potential 1018. This is somewhat of an record for low participation.
>
>Hi all,
>
>I have n
Le Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:52:01PM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:05:54PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >Le Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:57:06AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> >> With approximately 60 hours remaining, 142 people have voted, out of a
> >> potential 1018.
On 12/12/08 at 14:34 +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> The page of the vote [1] has a "Data and Statistics" section but without
> any stat available. In particular the list of voters (as in [2]) is not
> available.
http://master.debian.org/~neilm/gr_membership/ (but I had to ask Neil on
IRC)
--
Holger Levsen writes:
> On Friday 12 December 2008 12:57, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> ..Unranked choices are considered equally the least desired
>> choices, and ranked below all ranked choices...
>
> Are unrated choices considered equally or ranked below? Or what part of the
> logic do I miss here?
Hi,
On Friday 12 December 2008 12:57, Neil McGovern wrote:
> ..Unranked choices are considered equally the least desired
> choices, and ranked below all ranked choices...
Are unrated choices considered equally or ranked below? Or what part of the
logic do I miss here?
I mean, if I vote "12 ",
Does 5 refer only to firmware that is not currently identified as being
non-free? If that is the case, is 5 a viable choice? If it doesn't resolve the
problem completely and allow us to release then it needs to be accompanied by a
plan for the other problem firm/software.
- "Manoj Srivastav
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:34:09PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Neil McGovern a écrit :
>> With approximately 60 hours remaining, 142 people have voted, out of a
>> potential 1018. This is somewhat of an record for low participation.
>
> I voted 2 days ago (Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:12:55 +0100) but
Neil McGovern a écrit :
With approximately 60 hours remaining, 142 people have voted, out of a
potential 1018. This is somewhat of an record for low participation.
I voted 2 days ago (Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:12:55 +0100) but did not
received anything to confirm or reject my vote.
My mail was
Mes
This one time, at band camp, Charles Plessy said:
> Le Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:57:06AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> > With approximately 60 hours remaining, 142 people have voted, out of a
> > potential 1018. This is somewhat of an record for low participation.
>
> I have nothing against a vot
Neil McGovern wrote:
> With approximately 60 hours remaining, 142 people have voted, out of a
> potential 1018. This is somewhat of an record for low participation.
I deferred voting following reports of error bounces.
Regards,
--
MJ Ray (slef)
Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop b
Le Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:57:06AM +, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> With approximately 60 hours remaining, 142 people have voted, out of a
> potential 1018. This is somewhat of an record for low participation.
Hi all,
I have nothing against a voting period lasting the standard two weeks.
Have a
With approximately 60 hours remaining, 142 people have voted, out of a
potential 1018. This is somewhat of an record for low participation.
Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on Monday 8th Dec 2008
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Sunday,14th Dec 2008
Please note t
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> To cast a vote, it is necessary to send this ballot, with the text form
> (which is embedded later in this ballot) filled out, to a dedicated
> e-mail address, in a signed message, as described below.
Suggest restructuring to simplify:-
To cast a vote, complete the text
2008/12/10 Manoj Srivastava :
>
>Here is the *DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT* ballot for the GR. Please note
> the dates on the ballot; voting is not open yet.
>
>Please send comments to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org list.
[...]
> [ ] Choice 5: Assume blobs comply with GPL unless proven
16 matches
Mail list logo
