On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:52:36 +0200, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> This I consider silly. Thinking that the shorter voting period might
>> have influenced participation somehow skews the vote for the DPL?
>> Dow sending the CFV 24 minutes after the hour also skew the votes? Or
>> sending
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:58:34 +0200, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> You can express your opinions on this list without any problem, though
>> your opinion should not be expressed in an official reminder to vote
>
> Why not? I hold these opinions about t
Hi,
OK, another draft, now incorporating the last two
suggestions. I added a mention of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] location.
Now, GR votes have different wording: the full text of the
GR and amendments is included if it is short, or a pointer is put in
for the vote page otherwise
Manoj Srivastava dijo [Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:59:03PM -0500]:
> > Well, I don't think that's really important to the typical user -
> > people just want to know about the part they have to send back
> > in. Whether you call this "the ballot" or "the part of the ballot you
> > have edit in order to
On Sunday 13 April 2008 16:25:40 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed (or PGP signed) with your key that is
> in the Debian keyring. The voting software (Devotee) accepts mail that
> either contains only an unmangled OpenPGP message (RFC 2440 compliant),
> or a PGP/MIME mail
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 05:25:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> b) move the address to send the ballot to up front, where we mention
>it.
Good idea, and it can't hurt to repeat it.
Maybe also warn against group-replies? I personally think that we should
discourage such public voting, but
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:45:55 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Here it is - with some other changes while I was at it. (I also
> couldn't find the references to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the CFVs. Should
> there be some?)
I guess. It seemed pointless before, since you already hav
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:14:06 +0100, Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:45:02PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>
>> If ever I were to even consider basing my actions on your judgement,
>> I will take this under advisement. I have never been one for a
>> robotic
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:45:02PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> If ever I were to even consider basing my actions on your
> judgement, I will take this under advisement. I have never been one
> for a robotic secretary. Indeed, every CFV past the first one has some
> commentary on
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:12:20 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Well, I don't think that's really important to the typical user -
> people just want to know about the part they have to send back
> in. Whether you call this "the ballot" or "the part of the ballot you
> have edit in ord
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:42:05 +0200, Joachim Breitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Also wondering, since Nico’s replies were signed: Would it have been
> possible to redirect his reply to the voting address and thus change
> his vote? If done with the right timing, he might not have a chance to
> r
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:25:19 +0100, Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> When you send an email with From set to "Debian Project Secretary",
> you are supposed to cater to the opinion of the community, which was
No, I am not. The opinions of the community have little to do
with the
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:58:34 +0200, Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> You can express your opinions on this list without any problem, though
> your opinion should not be expressed in an official reminder to vote
Why not? I hold these opinions about the processes I am
following as a
On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 23:45 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> --
> 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Suggesting to vote for "Choice 2: John Doe 2" ? :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:12:20PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Can you present a sample ballot for, say, DPL election 2009? It
> > might help to see a full ballot and compare the points of difference.
>
> Will do (in another mail).
Here it is - with some other changes while I was at it.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:56:04PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:49:22 +0100, Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:15:36PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> >>
> >> The last time we had such a low turn out was in 2001, and then
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:49:22 +0100, Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:15:36PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>>> The last time we had such a low turn out was in 2001, and then we
>>> only had less than one third the number of
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:49:22 +0100, Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:15:36PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>>
>> The last time we had such a low turn out was in 2001, and then we
>> only had less than one third the number of developers. Yes,
>> shorte
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 08.04.2008, 12:39 +0200 schrieb Frank S. Thomas:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008 12:17, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > > > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines
> > > > > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- d81e16a2-03b6-4340-84f2-51de89b8185e
> > > > > > [XXX] Choice 1: Steve McInty
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:51:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I propose that you make the beginning look like this:
>
> > HOW TO VOTE
>
> > First, read the full text of [...variable data...]
>
> > The ballot is a small text form that is included below. It is cast
> > by sending a fi
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:44:09 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Huh. Looking at the ballot: , | ... | Do not erase anything
>> between the lines below and do not change the | choice names.
> Yes, you see, that's the point - the text just starts talking about
> not erasing somet
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:40:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> If you think the vote period is too short, then I suppose there
> is the option to see if other
> people consider it so too, and see if you can redo some of the
> constitutional amendment that was passed by acclaim last y
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:46:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 03:44:12 +0200, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > But I see how it would help if the CFV was more verbose about that,
> > and less verbose about other things. It goes on and on about the
> > technica
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:15:36PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>
> The last time we had such a low turn out was in 2001, and then
> we only had less than one third the number of developers. Yes,
> shortening the voting period has been such a *fun* experiment.
I think that us
24 matches
Mail list logo
