On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 03:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > And what exactly does this have to do with the technical committee?
>
> No idea. It looks like it all started with
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], and since you're still
> wondering about RC/RG bugs, I'm answering these questions.
It would be a
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 03:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > I thought all RC bugs were supposed to have severity "serious" or
> > higher. Has that been changed?
>
> RC != RG.
Ah, well then there is no need to berate me for failing to fix the bug
imm
Please respect list policies and don't duplicate mails.
On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I thought all RC bugs were supposed to have severity "serious" or
> higher. Has that been changed?
RC != RG.
> > You don't read debian-devel-announce, do you?
>
> Of course I do. What I said wa
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 02:46 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Actually, I'm very good about uploading fixes for RC bugs promptly.
> > The bugs I think you are referring to were marked severity
> > "important". Perhaps the bugs were tagged incorrectly?
>
On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Actually, I'm very good about uploading fixes for RC bugs promptly.
> The bugs I think you are referring to were marked severity
> "important". Perhaps the bugs were tagged incorrectly?
Severity != tag. And the severity is correct.
> I must have missed
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:33 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> But I would really prefer if you would fix your own packages instead of
> relaying on our BSPers.
Actually, I'm very good about uploading fixes for RC bugs promptly. The
bugs I think you are referring to were marked severity "important".
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:33 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I see; so there are no members of the technical committee who have
> > failed twice to vote?
>
> I'm not sure how not voting twice in a row makes someone a less
> important contributor by definition.
I see; so what number do you think w
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:13 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080316 21:01]:
> > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > The creiteria can be more than just voting on issues -- look for
> > > number of emails on threads on a
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080317 00:24]:
>
> On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:13 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080316 21:01]:
> > > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > > The creiteria can be more than just v
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080316 21:01]:
> On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > The creiteria can be more than just voting on issues -- look for
> > number of emails on threads on a issue raised, number of emails sent to
> > the bug report, numbe
Charles Plessy wrote:
> I started to wonder about modularity in the use of the Debian
> infrastructure in 2006, because of a problem with the clustalw package.
> As you can see on the graph, its popcon score started to decrease around
> july.
> (http://people.debian.org/~igloo/popcon-graphs/index.
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> All this replacement in favour of a better person sounds very
> nasty, mean, and likely to be highly subjective to me, and most
> organizations do not often throw people out while they are still
> performing their duties.
Of
Hi,
On Saturday 15 March 2008 22:40, Marc Haber wrote:
> Additionally, it may be a good idea to have regular "IRC conferences"
> where the DPL is available to answer questions. A good time would
> probably be a week after bits have been posted so that the questions
> that the bits have raised can
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:55:37 -0400, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Unfortunately, it seems to me that currently the project has no way of
> dealing with people who refuse to look at new ways of doing things.
Sure. The project has no way of dealing with people who are
14 matches
Mail list logo
