Hi aj,
Some parts feel very obvious to me. Am I missing something?
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 14:38 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> At present, how do you find packages that have been packaged by non-DDs
> and uploaded with the minimal checks by a DD in order to review them,
> or just get a sense of ho
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:13:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Also, on another front, adding AJ, Joey, and Ryan Murray to a team isn't
> exactly helping with getting new people involved who might have more free
> time. How many other hats do those three people already wear?
Oh, for me: ftpmaste
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:49:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I doubt this, honestly. For one thing, I doubt that AJ, as much as that
> > may be tempting, would actually hold a grudge that way for very long; [...]
> I also think Aj would be open to
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:57:53AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Giving more people the ability to try out their ideas directly is
> > valuable, and if the risks can be kept low, entirely worth doing.
> Hm. I have to admit I'd be much more inclined to v
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:30:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Personally, I think annual elections are a good thing, pretty much for the
> > reasons outlined by Jeff in:
> > http://lists.linux.org.au/archives/linux-aus/2005
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 10:47:22PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Sunday 29 July 2007, Clint Adams wrote:
> > 1. It creates another class of Debian participant when we should be
> >striving to have fewer classes.
> Does it really?
Yes, it does. Right now, in terms of upload ca
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 22:38, Martin Schulze wrote:
> FWIW, I believe that 2 years is too long, both for the DPL who may have
> to assign much more time to it than now, and for the project that may
> suffer under one DPL and would suffer even longer.
I wonder if a better course might not be to ke
* Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070731 09:48]:
> I propose we change section 5.2 of the constitution concerning appointment
> of the Project Leader to reduce the nomination period to a week, and the
> voting period to two weeks. In wdiff format:
>
> =
> 5.2. Appointment
>
> 1. The
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:30:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Personally, I think annual elections are a good thing, pretty much for the
> > reasons outlined by Jeff in:
> >
> > http://lists.linux.org.au/archives/linux-aus/2005-July/msg00030.h
Hi,
* Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-01 13:49]:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 02:21:43PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> >Hi,
> >* Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-31 13:35]:
> >[...]
> >I second this.
>
> According to § 3 of the "Procedures for submitting a General
> Resol
On Wednesday 1 August 2007 01:46, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
> >For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
>
> Met vriendelijke groet,
Your Dutch seems up to par, but why are you talking Dutch to
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 01:19:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> PS, probably too obvious to mention, but such an amendment needs to only
> take effect at the next election cycle.
Yes, no doubt about that.
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
--
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:38:15AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Please formulate a GR and I'll second it immediately. 18-24 months seems
> > sensible, annual elections are a waste of everyone's time.
>
> FWIW, I believe that 2 years is too long, both for the DPL who
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:30:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Personally, I think annual elections are a good thing, pretty much for the
> reasons outlined by Jeff in:
>
> http://lists.linux.org.au/archives/linux-aus/2005-July/msg00030.html
I'll summarize those as "if people want continuit
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:49:49AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > While we're at it, I've long felt that a one-year DPL term is just too
> > short (because a DPL needs to spend a few months to get worked in, and
> > can't do all that much when the ne
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the other hand, the only way it will get examined is if someone who
> thinks it's worth trying has the ability to try it. Otherwise we end up
> with endless discussion that just doesn't go anywhere.
> Giving more people the ability to try out their i
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> ... without ever *asking* if that would be true. I assumed this idea to
>> be dead because last year's discussion on -newmaint showed that most DDs
>> were against that proposal.
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> "I know the job is for two years, but I only want to do half the job, so
> please vote for me, I'm better than those others who are willing to do
> the whole job."
I'd better have someone do the job for only one year than someone not
doing the job
Steve Langasek wrote:
> I know, we should set the DPL term to be equal to the release cycle; that
> way the DPL will be suitably encouraged to make sure the release never
> stalls out ;)
>
"How long will you be DPL?"
"I'll go when I'm ready to go..."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Don't let the perfect be the ennemy of the good.
>
> I think one of the places where we're disagreeing is that I don't consider
> the current process fundamentally broken.
I don't think so (but it looks like Anthony seems to think so). I think it
works
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> ... without ever *asking* if that would be true. I assumed this idea to
> be dead because last year's discussion on -newmaint showed that most DDs
> were against that proposal.
Surely, "discussion on -newmaint" and "most DDs
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 08:29:46AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote:
> > I think that a longer term could be a good idea. There must be a
> > reason why DPLs are usually invisible and unable to address the real
> > problems in the project.
>
> Which, of course and quite naturally, s
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:13:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> (Ideally, in my opinion, there would be little or no sponsorship as there
> is today and instead there would be detailed review of one's packages
> leading to DM status for those packages as part of an NM process, with the
> other case
23 matches
Mail list logo
