Hi
The following is basically what I wrote in my blog a few minutes ago,
but IMO should also be on -vote, as thats the place where vote stuff is
handled, and noone can expect people to read blogs or planet...
The DM GR
=
So, let's join the postings about the currently running Debian
mai
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:48:26PM +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> Essentially the proposal allows non-DD maintainers (we have 900+, see the
> thread starting at [1] for details) to upload their own packages IF AND
> ONLY IF their sponsor has indicated agreement with that by having add
On Friday 27 July 2007, Bart Martens wrote:
> I agree that some non-DD's simply deserve upload rights. I also agree
> that some of those non-DD's waste time asking around for an upload. But
> I also think that the Debian Project must be very careful with selecting
> the people with upload rights,
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:24 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:48:52PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 13:02 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > On Friday 27 July 2007 12:22, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > > As a subscriber to the debian-med list, I do not s
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:48:52PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 13:02 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Friday 27 July 2007 12:22, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > > As a subscriber to the debian-med list, I do not share your view of this.
> > [...]
> > > I therefore do not agree t
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 13:02 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Friday 27 July 2007 12:22, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > As a subscriber to the debian-med list, I do not share your view of this.
> [...]
> > I therefore do not agree that your example is a valid one - rather, I think
> > teams/groups like
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:54:24 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I don't see a contradiction here; on the contrary I can imagine that
> > DMs take some work off the shoulders of DDs in teams.
> In teams, commit rights to the repository are enough for that. So, what
> is the point?
(Again, from my exp
Hi,
On Friday 27 July 2007 12:22, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> As a subscriber to the debian-med list, I do not share your view of this.
[...]
> I therefore do not agree that your example is a valid one - rather, I think
> teams/groups like debian-med are an excellent way to combine work of DD's
> and
On Friday 27 July 2007 06:40, Charles Plessy wrote:
> The Debian-Med project is in a growing phase that requires the gathering
> of programs and utilities which are easy to package and maintain, and
> which we keep in a common SVN repository.
>
> Needless to say, I would be very happy to see this G
* gregor herrmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070726 21:49]:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:40:29 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> > This is exactly what I don't like in the proposal. I think I already
> > said that, but DM is about pet packages, while Debian as a whole is
> > advocating Team work, Alioth,
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:00:14PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I agree as well, but it's all that we require DDs to subscribe to.
> > [That said, we really should work to make d-d-a enough; decisions that
> > and transitions that affect multiple pack
11 matches
Mail list logo
