Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Maybe relocating, but not on VAC AFAICS and still active on various
> This is not what I claimed.
So if it didn't hinder your participation in debian, it's probably not
the reason you still have no examples of DFSG-1-revisionist
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dealt with this in my original message.
So don't let my disagreement provoke a repeat if that causes unhappiness.
> For the record, I'm one of the
> people who doesn't believe this is the case without straining the reading
> of those two points. I thin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Maybe relocating, but not on VAC AFAICS and still active on various
This is not what I claimed.
>> Can't you come up with anything better than this?
>Why do I need to? Can you show that those DFSG-1-revisionists exist?
DFSG revisionists are the people holding one or mor
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070605 21:09]:
> So, how about we settle this once and for all? The DFSG is not an
> orthogonal basis for a vector space. The world won't end if we add a new
> point to it that some folks feel is redundant with what it already says.
> If there's a principle tha
4 matches
Mail list logo
