On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:25:26 -0700, Wesley J Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Friday 09 March 2007 18:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:08:05 -0700, Wesley J Landaker
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> > I don't object to hex (although I dislike prefix-less hex
>> > notati
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:57:07PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:41:43PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > > > 68k seems to have elected to skip official etch, but also seems to
> > > > have met the requirements. Some of the non-dd porters still want
> > > > an offic
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 03:30:18AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
>Hi,
>
>How much time do you generally have to read Debian-related e-mail?
>How much for the Debian mailing lists?
I normally expect to read most of my Debian-related mail every day. I
read several of the lists directly in my inbox, and
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:14:49PM +0200, Kari Pahula wrote:
>I would like to hear what the candidates think about the non-free
>section. Is having it hosted on Debian's infrastructure still worth
>it?
Yes, I believe so. Unfortunately, there are still quite a few packages
in non-free that a lot o
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 04:29:46PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>Hi,
>
>DebConf, the annual Debian Developers Conference, is currently not officially
>affiliated with Debian (or SPI) and its not listed on
>http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
>
>Do you think DebConf should have an official end
On Friday 09 March 2007 18:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:08:05 -0700, Wesley J Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> > I don't object to hex (although I dislike prefix-less hex notation
> > quite a bit in general), but this looks like it was chosen just to
> > avoid having to
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:08:05 -0700, Wesley J Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Friday 09 March 2007 16:18, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Given that this election has a record number of options, making us
>> move to using Hex instead of decimal numbers for ranking,
>^
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 05:08:05PM -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> On Friday 09 March 2007 16:18, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Given that this election has a record number of options,
> > making us move to using Hex instead of decimal numbers for ranking,
>^^^
On Friday 09 March 2007 16:18, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Given that this election has a record number of options,
> making us move to using Hex instead of decimal numbers for ranking,
^^^
> coupled with the fact that I'll be out of town all of next week, you
>
Hi,
Given that this election has a record number of options,
making us move to using Hex instead of decimal numbers for ranking,
coupled with the fact that I'll be out of town all of next week, you
are getting to see the draft ballot earlier this year than is the
norm.
Please
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:41:43PM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > > 68k seems to have elected to skip official etch, but also seems to
> > > have met the requirements. Some of the non-dd porters still want
> > > an official etch release.
> >
> > (They met the requirements after the architect
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 20:41:43 -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > > 68k seems to have elected to skip official etch, but also seems to
> > > have met the requirements. Some of the non-dd porters still want an
> > > official etch release.
> >
> > (They met the requirements after the architecture f
12 matches
Mail list logo
