On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:41:26 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So is there a difference between not voting and voting all options
> equal?
Yes, your name is recorded as someone who voted. Has no effect
on quorum or the outcome, though.
manoj
--
QOTD: "I haven
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:57:46 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.29.1613 +0100]:
>> But as far as I know, it's just the same as not voting.
>>
>> And I'm not sure what you think an invalid vote would have as
>> effect.
> In vot
also sprach Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.29.1736 +0100]:
> > In voting systems with a quorum, an invalid vote increases the
> > number of cast votes and thus makes it less likely for an option to
> > reach the quorum (which is expressed as a percentage). Please
> > correct me if I am wr
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 04:57:46PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.29.1613 +0100]:
> > But as far as I know, it's just the same as not voting.
> >
> > And I'm not sure what you think an invalid vote would have as effect.
>
> In voting systems w
also sprach Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.29.1613 +0100]:
> But as far as I know, it's just the same as not voting.
>
> And I'm not sure what you think an invalid vote would have as effect.
In voting systems with a quorum, an invalid vote increases the
number of cast votes and thus mak
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > 2808c3bb-6d17-49b6-98c8-c6a0a24bc686
> > [ 0 ] Choice 1: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation remains on hold
> > pending a vote
> > [ 0 ] Choice 2:
also sprach Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.29.1209 +0100]:
> > I don't actually know whether 0/0 is as invalid as I want it to be,
> > but we'll see.
>
> It should be. I voted 9/9 indicating my contempt for this vote, but it
> wasn't accepted.
0/0 was not accepted. Joey (Hess), was b
also sprach Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.29.1211 +0100]:
> > Finally, I am getting annoyed by all these GRs and the waste of
> > time that comes with them. Maybe I should thus propose a vote to
> > resolve that DDs must now stop wasting time and get back to
> > work.
>
> Hey, you shoul
Hi
Thanks for pointing me to information about this vote. I obviously
missed some parts of the debian-vote list, as I thought that newest
was listed first.
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 12:11:10PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2006-10-29 Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have tried to
On 2006-10-29 Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tried to determine what this vote is all about. I'm not
> subscribed to either debian-vote or debian-devel so all I can
> see is that is available from the web archives. I can not
> find anything about this, so personally I think it is
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I also don't understand why we vote whether to put something on hold
> or not until we vote about it. Or at least this is what the ballot
> suggests:
It's a feature of the constitution: if a vote is held to reverse a DPL
decision
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Finally, I am getting annoyed by all these GRs and the waste of time
> that comes with them. Maybe I should thus propose a vote to resolve
> that DDs must now stop wasting time and get back to work.
Hey, you should have seconded my
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > 2808c3bb-6d17-49b6-98c8-c6a0a24bc686
> > [ 0 ] Choice 1: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation remains on hold
> > pending a vote
> > [ 0 ] Choice 2:
Given that there's no easy way to get at the arguments for an
against this vote, other than wading through hundreds of -vote
mails, I cannot cast a vote.
I also don't understand why we vote whether to put something on hold
or not until we vote about it. Or at least this is what the ballot
suggests
14 matches
Mail list logo
