Re: GPG key problem with new vote keys

2006-10-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:17:25 -0500, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: >> I'm using mutt and gpg 1.4.5, but have severe problems using the >> vote keys. First, I do something like 'Ctrl-K' to import the >> key. This sometimes

Re: GPG key problem with new vote keys

2006-10-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > I'm using mutt and gpg 1.4.5, but have severe problems using the vote > keys. First, I do something like 'Ctrl-K' to import the key. This > sometimes gives me a message like 'processed: 0, imported: 1'. When I > then try to use a key

Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources.

2006-10-12 Thread Frank Küster
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I second the proposal below. It explicitly takes effect only for Etch, > and it will allow installation on machines requiring tg3 net drivers (of > which I have one). > > I believe this is the fourth second, so it only needs one more? Yes, me. I w

Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources.

2006-10-12 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:37:50AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > I second the proposal below. It explicitly takes effect only for Etch, > and it will allow installation on machines requiring tg3 net drivers (of > which I have one). > > I believe this is the fourth second, so it only needs one

Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources.

2006-10-12 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
I second the proposal below. It explicitly takes effect only for Etch, and it will allow installation on machines requiring tg3 net drivers (of which I have one). I believe this is the fourth second, so it only needs one more? Sven Luther wrote: > === START OF PROPOSAL === > Definition: For th

Re: Firmware vote rationale

2006-10-12 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:23:05PM +, Thaddeus H. Black wrote: > This is to record the reason behind my firmware GR vote > (not that you are expected to mind what I think, but I > wish to go on record at vote time anyway). Debian > should in my view treat firmware differently than other > soft

Re: Firmware vote rationale

2006-10-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 12 octobre 2006 à 14:23 +, Thaddeus H. Black a écrit : > Choice 2 ranks below Further Discussion mostly because I > am not yet sure that granting kernel upstream a > permanent special privilege the DFSG denies other > upstream developers is prudent in the long term. I think you are mi

Firmware vote rationale

2006-10-12 Thread Thaddeus H. Black
This is to record the reason behind my firmware GR vote (not that you are expected to mind what I think, but I wish to go on record at vote time anyway). Debian should in my view treat firmware differently than other software. Although this does not necessarily mean that Debian should distribute