On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:40:17PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 04:58:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Seriously, let this stay for now, vote on Frederik's GR for granting an
> > exception for etch, so we can work on etch on a timely fashion, and then
> > participate in t
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 04:58:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Seriously, let this stay for now, vote on Frederik's GR for granting an
> exception for etch, so we can work on etch on a timely fashion, and then
> participate in the debate Anthony proposed, which would culminate at the
> in-person di
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 01:11:18AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > (e) Following the release of etch, the Debian Project Leader shall:
> > i. ensure that the Debian community has a good understanding
> >of the technical and legal issues that
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:32:51AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >While I still believe that this proposal represents a reasonable position
> >for the project to take, the discussion over the past two weeks makes it
> >clear to me that a large enough fraction of our dev
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 02:16:26AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Frederik,
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:06:54PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > Overview:
>
> I asked you this question before privately and haven't seen an answer. You
> say below "So we propose this GR:"; does that mean
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote, ajt wrote:
Thanks Aj, that's the best GR proposed so far.
I second the proposal below.
Cheers,
Moritz
>
> The Debian Project resolves that:
>
> (a) The Social Contract shall be reverted to its original form,
> as at http://www.debian.or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>While I still believe that this proposal represents a reasonable position
>for the project to take, the discussion over the past two weeks makes it
>clear to me that a large enough fraction of our developership disagrees
>strongly with this interpretation that it's not in
* Debian-project Secretary:
> The details of the general resolution can be found at:
> http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_003
This document has been garbled, possibly due to charset issues.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi Frederik,
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:06:54PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Overview:
I asked you this question before privately and haven't seen an answer. You
say below "So we propose this GR:"; does that mean that everything up to
that is rationale, and not part of the text that develop
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I've tried to consolidate all the little "I would second this if" and
> remarks that people made (and I agree to), but that MJ Ray didn't
> outright reject. How about something like that? Would in particular MJ
> Raj, Sven Luther, Julien Blache
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:31:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:33:10AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 04:37:44PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>>> == Currently do not have enough seconds ==
>>> 5. Revert SC, firwmare need not follow DFSG #2
>>
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:33:10AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 04:37:44PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> > == Currently do not have enough seconds ==
>
> > 5. Revert SC, firwmare need not follow DFSG #2
> > Seconds:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) <[EMAIL P
12 matches
Mail list logo
