[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Not for some reason, for some very obvious reasons. They're not adequate
>as an immediate solution to this problem because separating the firmware
>from the packages that currently contain it is hard and needs development
*And* will need work from the kernel team for the
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 04:11:02PM +0100, Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
> Changes for the current draft:
> > + In case the DPL and ex-secretary can't agree on an candidate for new
> > secretary, the decision is made by the developers in a GR, and not by
> > the SPI board.
> Would this GR be conducte
Changes for the current draft:
> + In case the DPL and ex-secretary can't agree on an candidate for new
> secretary, the decision is made by the developers in a GR, and not by
> the SPI board.
Would this GR be conducted by the outgoing secretary? If the reason for
the disagreement is that the
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:22:08 +1000, Anthony Towns said:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:46:54AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Yet another draft. There are major changes in this version, so I
>> think we'll need to have people who seconded re-second the version
>> that comes out of this discussio
4 matches
Mail list logo
