* Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-20 01:49]:
> I think we really should be asking some of these questions throughout
> the year, instead of jammed into a brief 3 week period.
I agree. I actually wanted to express someting like this but I know
it didn't came across. What I wanted to sa
Anthony Towns
> GFDL (relating to the "can't chmod a document" and "can't distribute a
> transparent copy separately") -- it might be fair to be strict about that,
> because we've been bitten by not being strict in the past on issues such
> as the pine license, but otoh, there's been reported writ
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-19 02:15]:
> > I don't know if the candidates wish to answer these outside of the
> > campaign period or not, but if they wish to, feel free.
>
> I hope they will collectively agree not to. Surely 3 weeks o
Okay, so I'm going to ignore the end-of-campaigning thing and answer
the debate questions that didn't get asked 'til later, since I suspect
at least a few of them are probably pretty important at least to whoever
asked them. Or, at any rate, I'll answer some of the ones I have anything
to say about
4 matches
Mail list logo
