martin f krafft wrote:
>True. But I, for one, have my MUA set to honour M-F-T before R-T
>though.
>
>
Doesn't 'r' use reply-to and 'L' use Mail-Followup-To?
[headers indicate he's using Mutt]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
On 18 Mar 2006, Thaddeus H. Black stated:
> I wrote:
>> MJ Ray and I are preparing DPL Debate transcripts
>> now. I am de-interleaving the fine chaos of the
>> Debate's Part III free-for-all line by line, producing a
>> coherently readable semantical transcript.
>
> I have just seen the color-cod
also sprach Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.03.19.0135 +0100]:
> Presumably so you could debate the ballot itself...
... which is probably the rare case, when one could expect the
debater to ensure a proper recipient address. On the upshot, we'd
ensure that people don't accidentally publis
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
> Why do call for votes set
>
> Mail-Followup-To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
> Followup-To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Presumably so you could debate the ballot itself... they did set a
proper Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] though.
Don Armstrong
Why do call for votes set
Mail-Followup-To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Followup-To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
?
Could we add a filter to the debian-vote list to reject mails which
include non-empty ballots?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`.
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 05:41:06PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 52717dc0-26e3-4337-a88b-cc2c260fcb51
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: Jeroen van Wolffelaar
> [ 6 ] Choice 2: Ari Pollak
> [ 1 ] Choice 3: Steve McIntyre
> [ 4 ]
* Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-18 22:29:34]:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It is really nice to think of a DPL performing miracles. If I
> > could perform a Debian-miracle I would
> >
> > "make Debian predictable, purpose driven and a fun and rewarding
> >
Hi,
FIRST CALL FOR VOTES FOR THE DEBIAN PROJECT LEADER ELECTION 2006
= === = === === == === ==
Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on March 19th, 2006.
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on April 8th, 2006.
This vote is being conduct
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:40:40PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Jeroen - you want to push for a code of conduct. You want to write
> "insider reports". You want to act as a mediator. These tasks do not
> require you to be DPL. Why have you not been doing them for the past
> year?
I've been t
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:26:01PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > When I sent you a private mail complaining about the ad-hominem style of
> > one of your posts on -devel, you published it on your blog. Will you do
> > the same with the private mails sent you as a DPL, if you were elected ?
>
> I'd
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is really nice to think of a DPL performing miracles. If I
> could perform a Debian-miracle I would
>
> "make Debian predictable, purpose driven and a fun and rewarding
> context to work and spend time in."
It's clear that this requires good comm
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 09:29:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
>One of the major problems the project has faced is the inability to take
> a stand on major philisophical issues without extensive and often pointless
> deliberation. [...]
>
>My proposal, and related question, is that the DPL
* Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-11 13:20:19]:
> If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
> Debian to change, what would it be?
It is really nice to think of a DPL performing miracles. If I
could perform a Debian-miracle I would
"make Debian predictabl
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
> process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
> process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
For tasks not currently under anyon
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
>> Debian to change, what would it be?
>
> Make our mailinglists an enjoyable place for technical discussio
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:06:31PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Are there possible conflicts of interests between Debian and your "real
> life" ($WORKPLACE, whatever)?
No.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:02:37PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Is SPI important for Debian?
It's important, but there's not something wrong with it that I feel I
need to spend DPL-time on changing.
SPI is reasonable low-profile, amongst others because it's merely
infrastructural (legal, tra
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:20:19PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> If you were elected tomorrow as DPL, and could only pick one thing about
> Debian to change, what would it be?
Make our mailinglists an enjoyable place for technical discussions.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wrote:
> MJ Ray and I are preparing DPL Debate transcripts
> now. I am de-interleaving the fine chaos of the
> Debate's Part III free-for-all line by line, producing a
> coherently readable semantical transcript.
I have just seen the color-coded DPL Debate log Manoj
has posted [1]. It looks be
One or two of you have asked me for the list of questions I had gathered
pre-debate from you all. After consulting with Don, I can see no reason
not to post the list now. Here it is, for whom it interests.
So little time remains before the campaign's close, it would be
unreasonable to address th
Hi folks,
The platforms for the candidates for the project leader are
available as links on the page http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_002
or, http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/platforms/. The rebuttals are
also in place.
Thanks to stellar efforts on the part of Don Armstrong,
MJ Ray and I are preparing DPL Debate transcripts
now. I am de-interleaving the fine chaos of the
Debate's Part III free-for-all line by line, producing a
coherently readable semantical transcript. When done
de-interleaving, I should give the candidates 24 hours
to review and comment (regrettably
22 matches
Mail list logo
