On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:34:33PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> - Keyring Mainainance
> The only person working on this is very busy. More redundancy
> and a more user-driven attitude could help a lot. I have been
> talking to the keyring maintainer on several occasions last year
> but
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:53:40PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> At what point does a Debian Developer's behavior cross the line from
> annoying to destructive? At what point should the Developer be removed
> from the project [...]
I tend to think crossing the line once should result in polite c
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:22:54PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> 2.) Do you think this services should be made an official service of the
> debian project? Please give a reason for your answer.
I like to think of debian.net as an area where we experiment for things that
might or might not
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Now my question:
> >
> > 1.) Do you think it would be a good idea to handle debian-admin more
> > openly?
> >
> > 2.) Would you encourage debian-admin to do so? If yes, how?
> >
> > 3.) Do yo
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:16:34AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I'd like to ask some questions to the prospecitve project leaders:
> 1. Which are Debians top five strengths in your opinion?
In no particular order:
Breadth -- we include everything we can, and support whoever we can
Freedom -
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At this point, I am not in favour of such code. I am in favour of giving
> general guidelines and but not to enforce them. People should follow
> them because they agree with them but not because they are forced to.
> Not the least, that provides a real
This one time, at band camp, Martin Zobel-Helas said:
> Hi Ari,
>
> On Wednesday, 08 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> > Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > >1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile?
> > >... more questions about volatile ...
> >
> > Wasn't this just asked by Joey?
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile?
... more questions about volatile ...
Wasn't this just asked by Joey?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ari,
On Wednesday, 08 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> >1.) What is your opinion regarding the current status of debian-volatile?
> >... more questions about volatile ...
>
> Wasn't this just asked by Joey?
yes, in some parts. But as i consider myself as one of the
debian-v
I am happy to announce that both Margarita Manterola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> would
be willing to work on my DPL Team, should I get elected.
Margarita would be our community contact person.
Thank you very much, Margarita and Raphael, for your commitment
to Debia
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-07 12:34:05]:
> > [In short, if this is such a problem, what have you all been doing in
> > your personal capacity as developers to deal with it?]
[...]
> Apart from that, your question implies that one ha
#include
* Andres Salomon [Tue, Mar 07 2006, 04:53:40PM]:
> The reason for my question?
>
> jonas: i hope we never again meet in public, because i promise i
> will hit you if i do.
A-Ha. Let's buy them two boxing sets and popcorn for the rest of us.
Eduard.
--
anyone from the MIA team aroun
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Now my question:
>
> 1.) Do you think it would be a good idea to handle debian-admin more
> openly?
>
> 2.) Would you encourage debian-admin to do so? If yes, how?
>
> 3.) Do you think more DSA are needed?
I would li
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> What do you think of a code of conduct? What in your opinion would be a
> lower limit on acceptable behavior? Do you think that strict rules would
> be better than general guidelines? Who should be the judge if a
> particular case fo
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:03:52AM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> Then mail the ballot to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Don't worry about spacing of the columns or any quote characters
> (">") that your reply inserts. NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed
> (or PGP signed) with your key that is in th
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-06 14:42:54]:
> those questions are for Andreas only: twice in your platform you say
> "I can work full-time as DPL".
>
> Why can you make that claim ?
>
> If you any have any special arrangements to have free time for Debian, is that
> conditioned
* Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-07 12:34:05]:
> [In short, if this is such a problem, what have you all been doing in
> your personal capacity as developers to deal with it?]
I was not involved in the NM process actively, just talked to the
respective people to find out what would be
* Andrew Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-08 09:40:21]:
> Why has this not happened yet? Could we please have an update on this?
Because the responsible person at NetApp (one of the VPs) is a
busy man.
I recently got news on the topic and that the machine is being
worked on. I dont have a da
* Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-03 22:20:59]:
> A code of conduct has often been mentioned as a possible solution to
> various communication problems we have. The code would have to specify,
> either explicitly or implicitly, some rules for acceptable behavior.
>
> What do you think
* Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-07 20:09:11]:
> > When important teams seem to be disfunctional or have a hard time to
> > find a structure that scales into the future I would however use my
> > powers of delegation to restructure the team from the outside. I would
> > only do that a
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think it'd be particularly well-recieved if someone who, after
> all, was not elected, would assume leadership. Regardless of the
> constitutional issues, it was clear that there was some bit of angst
> among DD's during last year's campai
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:38:22AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> [+2 questions from other people]
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:39:52PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Why does it need to happen directly after r2?
> [+3 questions]
> > Uh, what the hell?
> [+2 things that might
[Don't Cc: me, I read the list]
Questions for all candidates:
In the Debian project, some people run many functions because they are
very competent and have free time to help on many different fronts.
The obvious consequence is a concentration of powers which is dangerous
when those people come
Anthony Towns wrote:
[+2 questions from other people]
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 04:39:52PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Why does it need to happen directly after r2?
[+3 questions]
>
> Uh, what the hell?
[+2 things that might be answers]
> This is why I hate trying to talk about things on Deb
ke, 2006-03-08 kello 09:23 +0100, Marc Haber kirjoitti:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:46:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:19:19AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > Feb 22nd, I mail both Joey (as SRM) and the security team noting the
> > >queue changes that sh
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:36:42AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> The process to expel a developer is described in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg5.html
> I am not sure whether all expulsion attempts get far enough
> to be recorded on -private or -project as described in
> t
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:40:40PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I think this is a poor response. There were several issues that the DPL
> team could have dealt with and didn't - it shouldn't have taken access
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to realise that, for instance, people had concerns over
> ft
On 3/8/06, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 7. What is your opinion about the current situation with the snapshot
>archive? Currently it doesn't run on projects assets.
On 12/14/05, Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote [1]:
> actually, NetApp (the storage company) and Intel
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:45:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:14:21AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > > Uh, what the hell?
> > > You have four people asking basically the same question, and you
> > > wonder about this?
> >
> >
Le mercredi 08 mars 2006 à 17:45 +1000, Anthony Towns a écrit :
> What discussion, exactly? There's a bunch of people telling me how I'm
> blocking the process and deliberately delaying point releases, Joey's
> demanding to be made an ftpmaster, and over what? A single mail that
> didn't get a repl
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:46:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:19:19AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > > Did you talk to the stable release manager before trying to reduce his
> > > > work load?
> > > Of course I did.
> > In the last four weeks?
>
> Yes:
>
> > Feb 22n
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:55:35AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:18:32AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >> After following the thread on here on -vote, I have the impression that
> >> this fixes something that's not a problem -
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:45:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:14:21AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > Uh, what the hell?
> > You have four people asking basically the same question, and you
> > wonder about this?
>
> Yes, because _all_ of them leap to the conclusion th
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:14:21AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Uh, what the hell?
> You have four people asking basically the same question, and you
> wonder about this?
Yes, because _all_ of them leap to the conclusion that I'm trying to delay
something, when I'm not.
> > I sent the mail reques
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 07:57:18AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > *shrug* I guess you've got a right to your own impression. Mine differs,
> > and I think I've got more to base it on than you do -- or than Joey does
> > for that matter. What do you want me to say?
> Which if course is a valid arg
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:19:19AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > Did you talk to the stable release manager before trying to reduce his
> > > work load?
> > Of course I did.
> In the last four weeks?
Yes:
> Feb 22nd, I mail both Joey (as SRM) and the security team noting the
>queue
Martin Schulze wrote:
>>Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea.
> This has been rejected by James Troup.
He's against the flying part, or giving pigs enough thrust? I for one
don't feel it's the sort of activity, entertaining though it might be,
that Debian shou
37 matches
Mail list logo
