On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:44:51PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> What if he wants to further distribute the stuff to other
> people who are using a device like his? I mean, sharing stuff useful
> to me is one of the prime reasons I like free software -- if stuff is
> useful, I can sha
On 12 Feb 2006, Craig Sanders told this:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:31:20PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>> Now, I'd like to download this (translated) manual and place it on
>> a portable device I own, so I can easily read it without killing a
>> bunch of trees. I think this is clearly a us
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:28:34PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > there's nothing in the GFDL that prevents you from doing that. the
> > capabilities of your medium are beyond the ability of the GFDL (or any
> > license) to control.
>
> This is
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> there's nothing in the GFDL that prevents you from doing that. the
> capabilities of your medium are beyond the ability of the GFDL (or any
> license) to control.
This is hardly true. The GFDL says you must transmit the original
Japanese text in the ca
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 05:19:37PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > don't be an idiot. you only have to keep the invariant sections if you
> > are DISTRIBUTING a copy. you can do whatever you want with your own
> > copy.
>
> Right, so you can't
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> don't be an idiot. you only have to keep the invariant sections if you
> are DISTRIBUTING a copy. you can do whatever you want with your own
> copy.
Right, so you can't *distribute* a copy on an ASCII-only medium, even
of the English translation of a
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:31:20PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Now, I'd like to download this (translated) manual and place it on a
> portable device I own, so I can easily read it without killing a bunch
> of trees. I think this is clearly a useful modification, and I think
> that I should
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:19:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> We have already discussed many examples, if you have some new example
> you are welcome to share it with us. :-)
I don't recall the following example being brought up.
Let's assume a manual, written by
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:10:19 +0200, Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:31:30PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
>>
>>> If my opinion is not the same as yours I am allowed to express my
>>> opinion in additional invariant section. Or if I think your opinion
>>> is misle
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:05:57AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 09:22 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> > Am I in violation of the License merely by unpacking make or
> > by doing an "tla get" on my machine? If I am, why is this free -- I
> > can't even
Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 22:16 +0200, Anton Zinoviev a écrit :
> GFDL doesn't place any restrictions on the form of the printed
> document. For example it can be a collection of unbound sheets of
> paper plus some unbound pictures plus some bug maps plus a cup or two.
> All you have to do in
Le dimanche 12 février 2006 à 09:22 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> Am I in violation of the License merely by unpacking make or
> by doing an "tla get" on my machine? If I am, why is this free -- I
> can't even unpack the sources " with no Invariant Sections, with no
> Front-Cover T
also sprach Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.12.0222 +0100]:
> s/include no invariant sections/don't include any significant contents
> to prevent our Freedom in invariant sections/ and matching changes to
> the text.
I think this sounds incredibly vague and leaves "significant" up in
th
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:51:08PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
>
> You are allowed to *accompany* your document with the license. But an
> invariant section must be *part of* the document. [...]
>
> In the case of a reference card (as I understand the DFSG), you
> would not be allowed to just dist
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:31:30PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
>
> > If my opinion is not the same as yours I am allowed to express my
> > opinion in additional invariant section. Or if I think your opinion
> > is misleading the readers I can object your opinion in footnotes.
>
> I think you compl
Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:03:45PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > In other situations, we might want to incorporate parts of the manual
> > into the source (for tooltips, help texts, usage examples, etc..). We
> > certainly couldn't do that with a GFD
On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant outgrape:
>>
>>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>> On 9 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
>>> The only people it made happy are extremists.
>
On Friday 10 February 2006 19:15, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> Thorough summaries written by representative proponents and opponents of
> each principal side of the GFDL debate would be well received at this
> time. Such summaries are requested. For other DDs, I cannot speak, but
> such summaries w
Hi,
I have a machine with multiple user accounts on it. On that
machine, I use cryptsetup to encrypt _all_ the partitions and swap,
apart from /boot. The machine runs SELinux, to provide and enforce
privilege separation, and my working area is labelled user_work_t.
Now, I also
2006/2/11, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There isn't anything to do with politess. If I hurted you, them please
> accept my apologies. But I'm frank enough to express my view as I
> feel them. As a non-native English speaker, the vocabulary might
> not always be appropriate.
Hmm, you should
Le Dim 12 Février 2006 02:22, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I second Adeodato Simó's proposal but at the same time I consider it
> still leaves some spaces for the absolutism interpretation which
> tends to plague Debian. I consider we should have reasonable space
> for "judgment" for many things
21 matches
Mail list logo
