On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 03:02:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns
wrote:
> Bcc'ed to -project, -legal and -private; followups to -vote please.
>
> It's been six months since the social contract changes that forbid
> non-free documentation went into effect [0], and we're still distributing
> GFDLed stuff i
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 03:02:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>Bcc'ed to -project, -legal and -private; followups to -vote please.
>
>It's been six months since the social contract changes that forbid
>non-free documentation went into effect [0], and we're still distributing
>GFDLed stuff in unsta
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 03:02:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Why the GNU Free Documentation License is not suitable for Debian main
> ~~
>
> (0) Summary
>
> Within the Debian community there has been a significant amount of c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony Towns writes:
> It's been six months since the social contract changes that forbid
> non-free documentation went into effect [0], and we're still
> distributing GFDLed stuff in unstable [1]. I think we should get serious
> about fixing that,
Bcc'ed to -project, -legal and -private; followups to -vote please.
It's been six months since the social contract changes that forbid
non-free documentation went into effect [0], and we're still distributing
GFDLed stuff in unstable [1]. I think we should get serious about fixing
that, and as par
Hi,
Firstly, a Happy new year to all of you, gentle readers.
At the end of voting, with 348 Ballots resulting in 305 votes
from 298 developers, "Establish declassification procedure for future
posts only" has carried the day. This mean that in 2006
debian-private is only privat
6 matches
Mail list logo
