On Friday 18 November 2005 15.41, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> --
>
> Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that the process
> defined in GR Proposal 2 will be applied *only* for the future content
> of debian-private mailing list.
>
> --
Q on procedure: will there be a single vote with GR 2 an
#include
* Anthony Towns [Tue, Nov 15 2005, 12:08:15PM]:
> Hello world,
>
> One of the issues Debian often stands for is transparency and openness
> -- indeed, the openness of our bug tracking system is codified in the
> Social Contract's statement "We will not hide problems". However, one
> part
Em Sáb, 2005-11-19 às 12:29 +1000, Anthony Towns escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:41:34AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > --
> > Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that the process
> > defined in GR Proposal 2 will be applied *only* for the future content
> > of debian-private mai
On 11:41 Fri 18 Nov 2005, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Just to formalize what I've already said...
>
> I think this should be considered for future -private content even if
> the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument
> against it is that people didn't expect to have it's pr
4 matches
Mail list logo
