On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:41:34AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> --
> Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that the process
> defined in GR Proposal 2 will be applied *only* for the future content
> of debian-private mailing list.
> --
So obviously as proposer of the origianl GR, I'm not
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:09:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
So, this has 7 sponsors now, namely:
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to formalize what I've already said...
>
> I think this should be considered for future -private content even if
> the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument
> against it is
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:36 -0600, Greg Norris wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:41:34AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > Just to formalize what I've already said...
> >
> > I think this should be considered for future -private content even if
> > the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, co
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ---
> In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
> seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
> made to the Debian Private Mailing List
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:09:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ---
> In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
> seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
> made to the Debian
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:41:34AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Just to formalize what I've already said...
>
> I think this should be considered for future -private content even if
> the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument
> against it is that people didn't expect
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I change my position as it seems that's needed to take it to the vote.
> I consider the whole proposal more important than the differences
> between them
Me too, but I suspect Manoj will be happy with Aj's new proposal, so I
will limit myself to seconding it.
--
see shy jo
Monroe Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think we have any moral right and barely any legal standing
> to publish messages which were made to a private mailing list under
> the current regime. The veto option doesn't cover this if we have
> lost contact with the author(s). Please add:
Any
Just to formalize what I've already said...
I think this should be considered for future -private content even if
the GR Proposal 2 (which I second) is rejected, considering one argument
against it is that people didn't expect to have it's private posts
revealed.
--
Thus, I propose that the Debi
Em Sex, 2005-11-18 às 16:09 +1000, Anthony Towns escreveu:
> Thus, I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ---
> In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
> seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
> made to the Debian Pri
Em Sex, 2005-11-18 às 16:09 +1000, Anthony Towns escreveu:
> Seconds so far:
>Don Armstrong (original or Manoj's changes)
>Joey Hess (original only, no comment on Manoj's changes)
>Wouter Verhelst (Manoj's changes, no comment on original)
>Bas Zoetekouw (Manoj's changes, no comment
It seems my previous post got lost or ignored. Retrying:
Anthony Towns wrote:
> * The team will automatically declassify and publish posts made to
>that list that are three or more years old, with the following
>exceptions:
I don't think we have any moral right and barely any legal stand
Op vr, 18-11-2005 te 16:09 +1000, schreef Anthony Towns:
> Okay, incorporating Manoj's proposed changes, and some other ideas:
[...]
> ---
> In accordance with principles of openness and transparency, Debian will
> seek to declassify and publish posts of historical or ongoing significance
> made to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony Towns writes:
> Okay, incorporating Manoj's proposed changes, and some other ideas:
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:08:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> One of the issues Debian often stands for is transparency and openness
>> -- indeed, the
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:09:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>Okay, incorporating Manoj's proposed changes, and some other ideas:
>
>On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 12:08:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>>One of the issues Debian often stands for is transparency and openness
>>-- indeed, the openness of
16 matches
Mail list logo
