Re: Proposal G

2004-06-03 Thread Florian Weimer
* Andreas Barth: > Actually, we hide security bugs. Of course not, if they are filled > into the bts, but we hide them if they are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please don't misunderstand me; I think the current approach is the > right one, but with literal reading SC #3 is tangled (and I know that

Re: _Our_ resolution merely affirms the status quo

2004-06-03 Thread Andreas Barth
* Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040602 07:10]: > I'm disappointed at the amount of nonsense being posted in this thread > along the following lines: > [...] > Now of course I have an opinion about what the Social Contract says > and I think people who disagree either have poor reading comprehens

Re: Proposal G

2004-06-03 Thread Andreas Barth
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040603 06:10]: > On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 03:09:16 +0200, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > * Manoj Srivastava: > >>> For our users, we promise to do regular releases; as a guideline, > >>> a major release of the distribution should happen about once a

Re: Proposal G

2004-06-03 Thread Andreas Barth
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040602 19:55]: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:27:58 +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040602 09:25]: > >> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 10:19:15 +0200, Andreas Barth > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> Reaffir