Prize Dept

2004-03-01 Thread Tony_D'Alessandro
Asked to contact re 50,000,000 visit to website Tony D'Alessandro Credit Manager - Yakka Pty. Ltd.

Re: Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot

2004-03-01 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:44:10PM +0200, Uri David Akavia wrote: > Can ordinary Debian users vote as well, and if so, how? > > Please CC to me as well, since I am not on the list. No, only people with their GPG key in the Debian keyring can vote, which is just developers (and perhaps others?).

Prize Dept

2004-03-01 Thread Tony_D'Alessandro
Asked to contact re 50,000,000 visit to website Tony D'Alessandro Credit Manager - Yakka Pty. Ltd.

Re: GR status

2004-03-01 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello Manoj, On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:31:41PM -0600, Debian Project secretary wrote: > Proposer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Seconds:1. Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2. Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 3. Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot

2004-03-01 Thread Uri David Akavia
Can ordinary Debian users vote as well, and if so, how? Please CC to me as well, since I am not on the list.

Automatic Email Filter [KS:404387A455FC]

2004-03-01 Thread accept
Mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> failed because of an automatic filter. You sent an email message to this site, but that message was caught by a automated message filter and wasn't delivered. This filter blocks email based on it's origin and/or content in an effort to reduce the amount of unwanted

Re: Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot

2004-03-01 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:44:10PM +0200, Uri David Akavia wrote: > Can ordinary Debian users vote as well, and if so, how? > > Please CC to me as well, since I am not on the list. No, only people with their GPG key in the Debian keyring can vote, which is just developers (and perhaps others?).

Re: GR status

2004-03-01 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello Manoj, On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:31:41PM -0600, Debian Project secretary wrote: > Proposer: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Seconds:1. Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 2. Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 3. Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot

2004-03-01 Thread Uri David Akavia
Can ordinary Debian users vote as well, and if so, how? Please CC to me as well, since I am not on the list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Automatic Email Filter [KS:404387A455FC]

2004-03-01 Thread accept
Mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> failed because of an automatic filter. You sent an email message to this site, but that message was caught by a automated message filter and wasn't delivered. This filter blocks email based on it's origin and/or content in an effort to reduce the amount of unwanted

Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposed Ballot

2004-03-01 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:17:57PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-02-29 04:13:12 + Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > This is a proposed draft of the ballot for this vote. > >Comments solicited. > > One of the proposers or seconders should draft the ballot. (A.2.3)

automated response

2004-03-01 Thread Customer Service
Thank you for your e-mail. Currently we are working to improve our level of customer service. Unfortunately to allow for these enhancements we have taken down our computer system to be upgraded. We have received and filed your e-mail. Please allow us several days to respond. Thank you for shopp

Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposed Ballot

2004-03-01 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 12:17:57PM +, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-02-29 04:13:12 + Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > This is a proposed draft of the ballot for this vote. > >Comments solicited. > > One of the proposers or seconders should draft the ballot. (A.2.3)

MMS Notification

2004-03-01 Thread MMS Notifier
This email that you sent on 03/01/2004, 08:14:03 AM with the subject information was electronically scanned and found to have an attachment with an .scr. Graybar Electric does not allow emails with .scr attachments and the email with attachment will not be delivered. If you feel this message is i

automated response

2004-03-01 Thread Customer Service
Thank you for your e-mail. Currently we are working to improve our level of customer service. Unfortunately to allow for these enhancements we have taken down our computer system to be upgraded. We have received and filed your e-mail. Please allow us several days to respond. Thank you for shopp

MMS Notification

2004-03-01 Thread MMS Notifier
This email that you sent on 03/01/2004, 08:14:03 AM with the subject information was electronically scanned and found to have an attachment with an .scr. Graybar Electric does not allow emails with .scr attachments and the email with attachment will not be delivered. If you feel this message is i

Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposed Ballot

2004-03-01 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-02-29 04:13:12 + Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a proposed draft of the ballot for this vote. Comments solicited. One of the proposers or seconders should draft the ballot. (A.2.3) [ ] Choice 2: Re-affirm support for non-free non-free "Paris in

Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposed Ballot

2004-03-01 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-02-29 04:13:12 + Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a proposed draft of the ballot for this vote. Comments solicited. One of the proposers or seconders should draft the ballot. (A.2.3) [ ] Choice 2: Re-affirm support for non-free non-free "Paris in the the

Re: "keep non-free" proposal

2004-03-01 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 10:33:42PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > Zenaan> That for me would be a next logical step after dropping > Zenaan> non-free. > ALast time I checked, we cared about our users and their needs. I bet > our users would rather us decide that GFDLed documentation can stay >