On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 18:29, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here is a spell checked version,
Not quite
...
> + 5.3 A Foundation Document requires a 3:1 super-majority for its
> + supercession. New Foundation Documents are issued and
This is still wro
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:29:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> ==
>
> 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>
>4.1. Powers
>
> Together, the Developers may:
> 1. Appoint or recall the Proj
Hi folks,
[My first attempt to send this out does not seem to have made
it to the list]
Here is a spell checked version, and also one that removes the
modify clause for the foundation documents. So now we may issue,
withdraw, and supersede these documents, but not modify
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:29:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> ==
>
> 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>
>4.1. Powers
>
> Together, the Developers may:
> 1. Appoint or recall the Proj
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 18:29, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here is a spell checked version,
Not quite
...
> + 5.3 A Foundation Document requires a 3:1 super-majority for its
> + supercession. New Foundation Documents are issued and
This is still wro
Hi folks,
[My first attempt to send this out does not seem to have made
it to the list]
Here is a spell checked version, and also one that removes the
modify clause for the foundation documents. So now we may issue,
withdraw, and supersede these documents, but not modify
Hi folks,
Here is a spell checked version, and also one that removes the
modify clause for the foundation documents. So now we may issue,
withdraw, and supersede these documents, but not modify them in
place.
==
4.
Hi folks,
Here is a spell checked version, and also one that removes the
modify clause for the foundation documents. So now we may issue,
withdraw, and supersede these documents, but not modify them in
place.
==
4.
8 matches
Mail list logo