-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 18, Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>We seem to have stalled on this proposal. There have been, if I
> recall correctly, three seconds to my proposal, and one request for a
> change, namely to explicitl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I prefer the amended proposal, but am willing to second either variant.
I quote the text in question for the record:
> -5. Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements.
> - These include documents describing the goals of the project,
Do you have any youth orientated email lists? I want to conduct a survey on
hip hop posters and r'n'b related merchandise & i would like to buy 5000
responses for $49. If possible could you tell me a liitle bit more about
your organisation?
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 18, Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>We seem to have stalled on this proposal. There have been, if I
> recall correctly, three seconds to my proposal, and one request for a
> change, namely to explicitl
Hi,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I am appending the proposal, and the amendment, to this mail
> message.
I second the proposal and the amendment.
> ==
> 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>
>4.1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I prefer the amended proposal, but am willing to second either variant.
I quote the text in question for the record:
> -5. Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements.
> - These include documents describing the goals of the project,
Do you have any youth orientated email lists? I want to conduct a survey on
hip hop posters and r'n'b related merchandise & i would like to buy 5000
responses for $49. If possible could you tell me a liitle bit more about
your organisation?
__
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 02:33:08PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>We seem to have stalled on this proposal. There have been, if I
> recall correctly, three seconds to my proposal, and one request for a
> change, namely to explicitly list the foundation documents in the
> constitution, whi
Hi,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I am appending the proposal, and the amendment, to this mail
> message.
I second the proposal and the amendment.
> ==
> 4. The Developers by way of General Resolution or election
>
>4.1.
Hi folks,
We seem to have stalled on this proposal. There have been, if I
recall correctly, three seconds to my proposal, and one request for a
change, namely to explicitly list the foundation documents in the
constitution, which also had one other supporter.
This proposed amendm
Hi folks,
We seem to have stalled on this proposal. There have been, if I
recall correctly, three seconds to my proposal, and one request for a
change, namely to explicitly list the foundation documents in the
constitution, which also had one other supporter.
This proposed amendm
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 02:33:08PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>We seem to have stalled on this proposal. There have been, if I
> recall correctly, three seconds to my proposal, and one request for a
> change, namely to explicitly list the foundation documents in the
> constitution, whi
Hi folks,
We seem to have stalled on this proposal. There have been, if I
recall correctly, three seconds to my proposal, and one request for a
change, namely to explicitly list the foundation documents in the
constitution, which also had one other supporter.
This proposed amendm
Hi folks,
We seem to have stalled on this proposal. There have been, if I
recall correctly, three seconds to my proposal, and one request for a
change, namely to explicitly list the foundation documents in the
constitution, which also had one other supporter.
This proposed amendm
14 matches
Mail list logo
