On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 16:04:00 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Now that our Constitution has been amended, I hope the original
> version will be archived in an easily accessible place; we should do
> the same for documents that we supersede or withdraw under 4.1.5.
The
Hey kcgzNWlBuGv Debian-vote PnnOH
9190 670
Hi folks,
Since I am no longer merely an interested observer in the GR
process, this is going to be hard.=20
When we talked about this the last time around, in the summer
on 2000, there were two camps, with two wildly different
interpretations of the constitution. Given the dif
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:27:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 16:04:00 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Now that our Constitution has been amended, I hope the original
> > version will be archived in an easily accessible place; we should do
> > the sa
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 16:04:00 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Now that our Constitution has been amended, I hope the original
> version will be archived in an easily accessible place; we should do
> the same for documents that we supersede or withdraw under 4.1.5.
The
I´m in contact with you, as the message asked to.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:04:00PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:12:17AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > I am not a developer, and thus can not propose this amendment. I would
> > still like to suggest it, however, in hopes that either Branden Robinson
> > will ac
I´m in contact with you, as the message asked to.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:04:00PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:12:17AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > I am not a developer, and thus can not propose this amendment. I would
> > still like to suggest it, however, in hopes that either Branden Robinson
> > will ac
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:12:17AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> I am not a developer, and thus can not propose this amendment. I would
> still like to suggest it, however, in hopes that either Branden Robinson
> will accept it, or that some other developer will sponsor it:
>
> In the Rob
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:12:17AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> I am not a developer, and thus can not propose this amendment. I would
> still like to suggest it, however, in hopes that either Branden Robinson
> will accept it, or that some other developer will sponsor it:
>
> In the Rob
11 matches
Mail list logo
