I second this resolution, and am attaching the full text below.
Simon
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:42:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi folks,
>
> This GR was first broached on December 14th, 18th and 19th,
> 2000, by Raul Miller.
Hi folks,
I would like to test the new voting scripts, complete with
signed acks. I'll be running this vote over on my home machine,
pending the resolution of the fact that devotee does not run on
potato (vote.d.o runs potato). This vote would also be a good test
of the super majority
I second the resolution.
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:42:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi folks,
>
> This GR was first broached on December 14th, 18th and 19th,
> 2000, by Raul Miller. A election methods committee was set up to
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
We have six seconds (well, five people on public mailing
lists) for the GR labelled: "Constitutional amendment:
Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying". It would not hurt to get a
few more sponsors for this GR.
=
Hi!
I second this proposal (quoted below for completeness)
> ==
>
> PROPOSAL
> __
>
> Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I second this resolution too.
On Fri, 16 May 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This GR was first broached on December 14th, 18th and 19th,
> 2000, by Raul Miller. A election methods committee was set up to
> examine the issue and
I second the resolution.
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:42:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> ==
>
> PROPOSAL
> __
>
> Constitutional amend
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:39:00PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> In less than 24 hours, I'll declare this draft creation
> process done, and formally call for seconds. This draft no longer
> contains language empowering the secretary to cut the vote short
> "when
--- Begin Message ---
> ==
>
> PROPOSAL
> __
>
> Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying:
> _
Seems reasonable. Seconded.
(full message deliberately quoted)
On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 13:42, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi folks,
>
> This GR was first broached on December 14th, 18th and 19th,
> 2000, by Raul Miller. A election methods
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 12:42:59PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> ==
>
> PROPOSAL
> __
>
> Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof
Hi folks,
I have been working on refactoring the voting engine since
last year (though I did not deploy the new version for this years DPL
elections). The new code has common elelmets factored out, uses a
real parser (with a formal grammar to parse configuration files); and
has implem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
This GR was first broached on December 14th, 18th and 19th,
2000, by Raul Miller. A election methods committee was set up to
examine the issue and come up with recommendations, and a cast of
characters got together to put this fin
On Friday, May 16, 2003, at 09:24 AM, Davi Leal wrote:
Does the Debian Voting System allow secure-anonymous voting?.
This has been discussed in the past --- please check the mailing list
archives. It was analyzed in detail by several people (myself included,
though I made several mistakes,
Hi,
Does the Debian Voting System allow secure-anonymous voting?.
Does it works over centralised servers?. A central email server?.
Thanks,
Davi
15 matches
Mail list logo
