Re: Ending votes early

2003-05-12 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I suggest we strike the clause about the secretary's ability > to end votes early. I was wondering about the issue of vote changability. I'm not exactly a veteran in the voting procedures debate, but for what it's worth, I think this clause

Re: Ending votes early

2003-05-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 12 May 2003 19:44:48 -0400, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:52:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> After re-reading the draft (prompted by Branden on IRC), I think I >> don't know how to define "when the vote is no longer in doubt", >> since people ca

Re: Ending votes early

2003-05-12 Thread Raul Miller
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:52:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > After re-reading the draft (prompted by Branden on IRC), I > think I don't know how to define "when the vote is no longer in > doubt", since people can always revote. Clearly the idea doesn't make sense if everybody change

Re: Ending votes early

2003-05-12 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > I suggest we strike the clause about the secretary's ability > to end votes early. i concur. -john

Ending votes early

2003-05-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi folks, After re-reading the draft (prompted by Branden on IRC), I think I don't know how to define "when the vote is no longer in doubt", since people can always revote. Say, with 1000 voters, on day 1, 800 people voted option A over option B, and 100 people vote option B ov

May 12th voting draft

2003-05-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi folks, We seem to have stalled again. This is the latest copy of the voting GR I have. I think I have incorporated the latest changes that we decided upon, please correct me if I missed something. I really would like to nail this down, and start the 2 week discussion period