Re: Questions for all candidates

> 6. Many people complaint that the pool is too bloated, priorities too >generic, too many packages to pick the right one from the list... > [x] making some packages be more "important" to others is bad and will > make create some kind of "elite" and "second class" packages > [x] we need a

Re: Questions for all candidates

* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-21 00:48]: > 1. master.debian.org is still running potato. What do you think about >that ? > > [ ] The debian admins should be blamed > [ ] They must have good reasons to not have upgraded > [ ] Nothing, i have to ask some explanations first >

Re: Questions for Martin

* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-20 23:49]: > You explain that too many external projects do not make the effort > to integrate their work within Debian and you want to do better in > this area ... but do you have some specific external projects in > mind already ? Well, I know of tw

Re: Questions for all candidates

> 6. Many people complaint that the pool is too bloated, priorities too >generic, too many packages to pick the right one from the list... > [x] making some packages be more "important" to others is bad and will > make create some kind of "elite" and "second class" packages > [x] we need a

Re: Questions for all candidates

* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-21 00:48]: > 1. master.debian.org is still running potato. What do you think about >that ? > > [ ] The debian admins should be blamed > [ ] They must have good reasons to not have upgraded > [ ] Nothing, i have to ask some explanations first >

Re: Questions for Martin

* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-20 23:49]: > You explain that too many external projects do not make the effort > to integrate their work within Debian and you want to do better in > this area ... but do you have some specific external projects in > mind already ? Well, I know of tw