Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

2003-02-15 Thread moth
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:14:57PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Glad to see you are back. Want to take over the stewardship of > this GR again? I'll be happy to contribute, as I can, but I don't want to get in the way, and I can't guarantee that I'll be able to put as much time into

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

2003-02-15 Thread moth
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:14:57PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Glad to see you are back. Want to take over the stewardship of > this GR again? I'll be happy to contribute, as I can, but I don't want to get in the way, and I can't guarantee that I'll be able to put as much time into

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

2003-02-15 Thread Markus Schulze
Dear Clinton, you wrote (14 Feb 2003): > Participation Monotonicity. > > If > (i) There is an election X in which option A wins. > (ii) There is a vote V ranks option A over option B. > (iii) There is an election Y identical to election X except that it has > an additional vote V. > then > Option

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

2003-02-15 Thread Markus Schulze
Dear Clinton, you wrote (14 Feb 2003): > Participation Monotonicity. > > If > (i) There is an election X in which option A wins. > (ii) There is a vote V ranks option A over option B. > (iii) There is an election Y identical to election X except that it has > an additional vote V. > then > Option