Re: Debian Project Leader Election

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:15:22AM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > The nomination period is at an end, with three candidates > standing forth to be counted. The candidates are: >o Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >o Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >o Martin Mi

Debian Project Leader Election

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, The nomination period is at an end, with three candidates standing forth to be counted. The candidates are: o Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> o Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> o Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> o

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

I believe most efficient way to get an effective election method it to build up a set of essential criteria, and select a method that matches those criteria. I found the criteria mentioned on electionmethods.org too vague for me to understand, due to the use of the words 'sincerly' and 'not fal

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:52:26AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:05:42PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > It is possible to have an election where there is no casting vote. For > > example, electing the chairman of the Technical Committee when the > > current chairman is

Re: QUESTIONNAIRE: Debian Project Leadership

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:11:27AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > Won't you publish the results of the survey? Yes; please see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200302/msg6.html > Won't you run for DPL this year? (Deadline is today 00:00 UTC) Yes, please see

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 12:52:26AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:05:42PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > It is possible to have an election where there is no casting vote. For > > example, electing the chairman of the Technical Committee when the > > current chairman is

Re: QUESTIONNAIRE: Debian Project Leadership

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:11:27AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > Won't you publish the results of the survey? Yes; please see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200302/msg6.html > Won't you run for DPL this year? (Deadline is today 00:00 UTC) Yes, please see

nomination

With this message, I declare my candidacy for the position of Debian Project Leader in the forthcoming elections. I'd like to extend my thanks to those who took the time to answer my questionnaire, and to those who sent along words of encouragement, urging me to run. -- G. Branden Robinson

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

Hi Manoj, On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:28:09AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > is the new version, with the input of people on the list. I'm happy with this, now. Thank you for your work, Jochen -- Omm (0)-(0) http:/

nomination

With this message, I declare my candidacy for the position of Debian Project Leader in the forthcoming elections. I'd like to extend my thanks to those who took the time to answer my questionnaire, and to those who sent along words of encouragement, urging me to run. -- G. Branden Robinson

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:47:10AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > writes: > > I would expect a potential DPL candidate to be involved > enough in the project to read -vote, or to be able to at least look >

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Clinton Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Regarding the Feburary 7th draft. Are the results this draft > produces equivalent to the results produced using this method? > (a) All voters tick an 'approved' box next to all options that > would > of be

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it possible to have a list of people would have nominated > themselves available during the nomination period and not only > after ? Maybe on ? This list maybe > important for h

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

Hi Manoj, On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:28:09AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > is the new version, with the input of people on the list. I'm happy with this, now. Thank you for your work, Jochen -- Omm (0)-(0) http:/

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

Hi This is the new version, with the input of people on the list. 1 Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Re worded section 3 to "when the outcome is no longer in doubt" 2 Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" A.3: Added quotes around Fu

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:47:10AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > In article <20030213105818.C7247@yellowpig>, Bill Allombert ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would expect a potential DPL candidate to be involved > enough in the project to read -vote, or to be able to at least lo

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Clinton Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >writes: > Regarding the Feburary 7th draft. Are the results this draft > produces equivalent to the results produced using this method? > (a) All voters tick an 'approved' box next to all options that > would > of

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections

> In article <20030213105818.C7247@yellowpig>, Bill Allombert ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it possible to have a list of people would have nominated > themselves available during the nomination period and not only > after ? Maybe on ? This list maybe >

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

Hi This is the new version, with the input of people on the list. 1 Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Re worded section 3 to "when the outcome is no longer in doubt" 2 Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" A.3: Added quotes around Fu

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

Sorry for coming in late: On 05-Feb-03, 13:25 (CST), Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >A.6 Vote Counting > > 2. If the ballot has a quorum requirement (Q) any options other > than the default option which do not receive at least Q votes > ranking that option a

Re: Dec 15 voting amendment draft

Sorry for coming in late: On 05-Feb-03, 13:25 (CST), Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >A.6 Vote Counting > > 2. If the ballot has a quorum requirement (Q) any options other > than the default option which do not receive at least Q votes > ranking that option a

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections

Bill Allombert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:28:06PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is the final day of the nomination period, which started > > on 2003/01/24, and shall end on 2003/02/14 00:00:00 UTC. The > > campaigning period shall start then. Voting

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections

On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:28:06PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > Hi, > > This is the final day of the nomination period, which started > on 2003/01/24, and shall end on 2003/02/14 00:00:00 UTC. The > campaigning period shall start then. Voting shall start on March 7th > (2003

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections

Bill Allombert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:28:06PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is the final day of the nomination period, which started > > on 2003/01/24, and shall end on 2003/02/14 00:00:00 UTC. The > > campaigning period shall start then. Voting

Re: QUESTIONNAIRE: Debian Project Leadership

El día 02 feb 2003, Branden Robinson escribía: > [Reply-To is set. This message is written with the intention of > soliciting private replies; however, if you want to reply to debian-vote > as well, go ahead.] > > Hi folks, Won't you publish the results of the survey? Won't you run for DPL

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections

On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:28:06PM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > Hi, > > This is the final day of the nomination period, which started > on 2003/01/24, and shall end on 2003/02/14 00:00:00 UTC. The > campaigning period shall start then. Voting shall start on March 7th > (2003

Re: QUESTIONNAIRE: Debian Project Leadership

El día 02 feb 2003, Branden Robinson escribía: > [Reply-To is set. This message is written with the intention of > soliciting private replies; however, if you want to reply to debian-vote > as well, go ahead.] > > Hi folks, Won't you publish the results of the survey? Won't you run for DPL