Hello,
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:48:40PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> ie, the steps I'm suggesting are:
>
> 1. If there's a default option, satisfy quorum and supermajority
> [this leaves us with the default option, and those other
>options that satisify q &
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 03:23:05PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> It depends on how anal one wants to be. By that token, last
> year we were in violation of the constitution since we started two
> weeks late; this year we are back on schedule.
>
> If there is strong sentiment that
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:25:46PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Replace A.3 with:
> >> A.3. Voting procedure
> >> 1. Each independent set of related amendments is voted on in a
> >> separate ballot. Each such ballot has as options all the sensible
> >> combinations of amendments and opt
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 03:23:05PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> It depends on how anal one wants to be. By that token, last
> year we were in violation of the constitution since we started two
> weeks late; this year we are back on schedule.
>
> If there is strong sentiment that
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:25:46PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Replace A.3 with:
> >> A.3. Voting procedure
> >> 1. Each independent set of related amendments is voted on in a
> >> separate ballot. Each such ballot has as options all the sensible
> >> combinations of amendments and opt
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:20:13PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> you also did a good job at the thankless task of Treasurer. it's a crap
> job, but somebody has to do it, and you did it well with regular reports
> and updates and generally showed good organisational skills.
I appreciate the compl
>>"Aj" == Anthony Towns writes:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:12:31PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Under 4.2 Procedure [for developers during a general resolution or
election> , change item 3 to read:
>> 3. Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes and tallies results
>
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMO, the fact that you're confrontational and opinionated is a good
> thing. the DPL should take a far more active and front-line role,
> and set the agenda (for action and for debate).
Agree completely. Bonus points for not leaving in a huff when thin
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:20:13PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> you also did a good job at the thankless task of Treasurer. it's a crap
> job, but somebody has to do it, and you did it well with regular reports
> and updates and generally showed good organisational skills.
I appreciate the compl
>>"Aj" == Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:12:31PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Under 4.2 Procedure [for developers during a general resolution or
election> , change item 3 to read:
>> 3. Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes and tallies res
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMO, the fact that you're confrontational and opinionated is a good
> thing. the DPL should take a far more active and front-line role,
> and set the agenda (for action and for debate).
Agree completely. Bonus points for not leaving in a huff when thin
* Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-05 21:20]:
> one day an inactive developer will become active again, and they
> shouldn't have to go through the whole New Maintainer process
They generally don't have to go through NM again, just to submit their
GPG keys.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL P
* Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-05 21:20]:
> one day an inactive developer will become active again, and they
> shouldn't have to go through the whole New Maintainer process
They generally don't have to go through NM again, just to submit their
GPG keys.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL P
overall, i'd probably vote for you if it wasn't for the fact that you're
against having non-free in the debian ftp archives. in fact, i'd be
tempted to vote for even knowing that you're against non-free, because
the majority of developers would probably vote down any attempt to
remove it. you ma
overall, i'd probably vote for you if it wasn't for the fact that you're
against having non-free in the debian ftp archives. in fact, i'd be
tempted to vote for even knowing that you're against non-free, because
the majority of developers would probably vote down any attempt to
remove it. you ma
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:12:31PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Under 4.2 Procedure [for developers during a general resolution or
> election], change item 3 to read:
> 3. Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes and tallies results
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:12:31PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Under 4.2 Procedure [for developers during a general resolution or
> election], change item 3 to read:
> 3. Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes and tallies results
17 matches
Mail list logo
