Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying

2002-10-21 Thread Raul Miller
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:42:26PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Sorry, there's a "Smith set", not a Schulze set. So presumably we mean the > Schwartz set. Yes. > *shrug* Then how about "An option A is said to master an option, B, > if A beats B, or if there is some other option, C, where A beats

Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying

2002-10-21 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:30:46PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > *shrug* Then how about "An option A is said to master an option, B, > > if A beats B, or if there is some other option, C, where A beats C and > > C masters B." ? Or "transitively beats" ? > In my first draft, I used "Option j is PREF

Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying

2002-10-21 Thread Raul Miller
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 03:42:26PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Sorry, there's a "Smith set", not a Schulze set. So presumably we mean the > Schwartz set. Yes. > *shrug* Then how about "An option A is said to master an option, B, > if A beats B, or if there is some other option, C, where A beats

Un site plus rentable

2002-10-21 Thread tdinc
** Ceci n'est pas un spam. pour retirez votre courriel de la liste: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sujet : remove + votre adresse *** Bonjour, Aujourd'hui je vous écris pour vous écr

Un site plus rentable

2002-10-21 Thread tdinc
** Ceci n'est pas un spam. pour retirez votre courriel de la liste: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sujet : remove + votre adresse *** Bonjour, Aujourd'hui je vous écris pour vous écr