>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> A precis:
And the full Monte:
The emails that started this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2000/debian-vote-22/msg00014.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2000/debian-vote-22/msg00015.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:52:38AM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> [...] a GR to fix the voting process as defined in the constitution [...]
A precis:
* The vote counting method is really "Condorcet" not
"Concorde". Kinda, almost.
* It's not obvious how to coun
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anthony> A precis:
And the full Monte:
The emails that started this:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2000/debian-vote-22/msg00014.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2000/debian-vote-22/msg00015.html
http://lis
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:52:38AM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> [...] a GR to fix the voting process as defined in the constitution [...]
A precis:
* The vote counting method is really "Condorcet" not
"Concorde". Kinda, almost.
* It's not obvious how to cou
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:52:38AM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> To recap the discussions held nearly a year and a half ago
> (examining the debian-vote and debian-devel archives may prove
> illuminating).
Thanks for raising this issue, Manoj!
--
G. Branden Robinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
In December 2000, Raul Miller proposed a GR to fix the voting
process as defined in the constitution. The GR was withdrawn until a
committee assigned to study the problem returned with a
recommendation. We have a clear recommendation f
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:52:38AM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> To recap the discussions held nearly a year and a half ago
> (examining the debian-vote and debian-devel archives may prove
> illuminating).
Thanks for raising this issue, Manoj!
--
G. Branden Robinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
In December 2000, Raul Miller proposed a GR to fix the voting
process as defined in the constitution. The GR was withdrawn until a
committee assigned to study the problem returned with a
recommendation. We have a clear recommendation
8 matches
Mail list logo