Bdale Garbee wrote:
>
> While I don't mind being called out for this question since I mentioned my
> new job explicitly in my platform posting, if this is a topic you are
> concerned about, perhaps you should ask all of us?
> [...]
> Hmmm. I think those who have met me in person or heard me spea
* Nicolas SABOURET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020305 02:22]:
> far as I understand, this means that you attend these conferences more
> as a HP member than as a Debian member.
I really dont feel thats completely fair. Have you looked at how most
of these 'confrences' nickle-and-dime everyone into havi
Hi everyone,
A couple of questions for the candidates:
1. The project's main goal is to produce a 100% free operating system,
and in my opinion we are doing quite well in that respect. But the
question of *how* this goal is achieved is seldom posed. In
particular, I have the feel
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:26:39AM -0500, Dale E Martin wrote:
> True, point taken and I do feel you've been doing a good job as SPI
> treasurer, BTW. And I think you've done an amazing job with X, too,
> despite being harsh with people from time to time - you've definitely
> backed up the talk wi
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:55:19PM +1100, Sam Couter wrote:
> I'm assuming the Release Manager is a DPL Delegate, since I can't find
> the position mentioned in the Constitution. If I'm wrong, someone
> correct me please.
It's my understanding that the Release Manager is a delegate of the DPL.
See
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:24:36PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David N. Welton) writes:
>
> > I want to know how the
> > DPL candidates would handle a situation like this so as to 1) get
> > services restored quickly and securely, or at the very minimum, keep
> > the rank and f
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:26:39AM -0500, Dale E Martin wrote:
> True, point taken and I do feel you've been doing a good job as SPI
> treasurer, BTW. And I think you've done an amazing job with X, too,
> despite being harsh with people from time to time - you've definitely
> backed up the talk w
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:55:19PM +1100, Sam Couter wrote:
> I'm assuming the Release Manager is a DPL Delegate, since I can't find
> the position mentioned in the Constitution. If I'm wrong, someone
> correct me please.
It's my understanding that the Release Manager is a delegate of the DPL.
Se
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 07:24:36PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David N. Welton) writes:
>
> > I want to know how the
> > DPL candidates would handle a situation like this so as to 1) get
> > services restored quickly and securely, or at the very minimum, keep
> > the rank and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale E Martin) writes:
> Do you have ideas about/interest in these issues? Is it Debian's role to
> play, or someone else's?
My gut feeling is that this role might be more suited to SPI than Debian.
Bdale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nicolas SABOURET) writes:
> As a consequence to this new job, you are "now more able to attend and
> speak at Linux and related technical conferences than before" (cit.). As
> far as I understand, this means that you attend these conferences more
> as a HP member than as a Debia
Le Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:46:33AM -0500, Dale E Martin écrivait:
> Do you have ideas about/interest in these issues? Is it Debian's role to
> play, or someone else's?
I think that we shouldn't be a force that can influence a
government or anything like that. However I believe that we could
suppo
This is from Branden's platform:
> As DPL, I would like to take steps to get Debian's voice heard in the
> halls of government if and where appropriate, so that our ideals -- and
> our means of achieving them -- are not legislated out of existence by
> governments hostile to them (or, more likely,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale E Martin) writes:
> Do you have ideas about/interest in these issues? Is it Debian's role to
> play, or someone else's?
My gut feeling is that this role might be more suited to SPI than Debian.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nicolas SABOURET) writes:
> As a consequence to this new job, you are "now more able to attend and
> speak at Linux and related technical conferences than before" (cit.). As
> far as I understand, this means that you attend these conferences more
> as a HP member than as a Debi
Le Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:46:33AM -0500, Dale E Martin écrivait:
> Do you have ideas about/interest in these issues? Is it Debian's role to
> play, or someone else's?
I think that we shouldn't be a force that can influence a
government or anything like that. However I believe that we could
supp
> Yes. By making reference to my SPI Treasurer work, I was endeavoring to
> illustrate how, in many respects, I've already done so. Maybe it's just
> me, but I think this is a better approach than glib testimonials about
> how "yes, I'll be a good boy in the future".
True, point taken and I do f
This is from Branden's platform:
> As DPL, I would like to take steps to get Debian's voice heard in the
> halls of government if and where appropriate, so that our ideals -- and
> our means of achieving them -- are not legislated out of existence by
> governments hostile to them (or, more likely
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:28:47PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > When CosmicRay
> CosmicRay?
Err, sorry... John Goerzen.
Jordi
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux
Reinos de Leyend
>> Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When CosmicRay
CosmicRay?
--
M.
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:21:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Would you push to get a final answer on that debate?
> I think it is important that the General Resolution that John Goerzen
> proposed almost 2 years ago come to a vote. As DPL, I will work with
> the Project Secretary to see
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:46:24PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I have not planned to relaunch this debate since I'm happy with
> the status-quo. However if some people really believe I'm wrong
> and go as far as launching a general resolution to propose the
> removal of non-free, I'll make sur
Sam Couter wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please keep in mind that a DPL can't force a release without
> > becoming a bugfixing maniac.
>
> But he can influence the release management fairly heavily through the
> selection of a Release Manager.
Oh. Wonderful. How many pe
> Yes. By making reference to my SPI Treasurer work, I was endeavoring to
> illustrate how, in many respects, I've already done so. Maybe it's just
> me, but I think this is a better approach than glib testimonials about
> how "yes, I'll be a good boy in the future".
True, point taken and I do
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a DPL can't force a release without
> becoming a bugfixing maniac.
But he can influence the release management fairly heavily through the
selection of a Release Manager.
I'm assuming the Release Manager is a DPL Delegate, since
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:28:47PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > When CosmicRay
> CosmicRay?
Err, sorry... John Goerzen.
Jordi
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom,
aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Using Debian GNU/Linux
Reinos de Leyen
>> Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When CosmicRay
CosmicRay?
--
M.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:21:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Would you push to get a final answer on that debate?
> I think it is important that the General Resolution that John Goerzen
> proposed almost 2 years ago come to a vote. As DPL, I will work with
> the Project Secretary to se
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:46:24PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I have not planned to relaunch this debate since I'm happy with
> the status-quo. However if some people really believe I'm wrong
> and go as far as launching a general resolution to propose the
> removal of non-free, I'll make su
Sam Couter wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please keep in mind that a DPL can't force a release without
> > becoming a bugfixing maniac.
>
> But he can influence the release management fairly heavily through the
> selection of a Release Manager.
Oh. Wonderful. How many p
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a DPL can't force a release without
> becoming a bugfixing maniac.
But he can influence the release management fairly heavily through the
selection of a Release Manager.
I'm assuming the Release Manager is a DPL Delegate, since
Bdale Garbee wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Noel Koethe) writes:
>
> > 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> > (every x month)
>
> It would be cool if we could arrange to have a major release every 12 months,
> and point releases every 2-3 months. The exact intervals are less
Hi,
In your bibliography, you explain that you are now involved in HP's LSO.
I believe this is a very good point since Linux needs efficient hardware
support in the kernel and other applications (e.g. video cards).
As a consequence to this new job, you are "now more able to attend and
speak at Lin
Bdale Garbee wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Noel Koethe) writes:
>
> > 1. How often should there be a stable release if possible?
> > (every x month)
>
> It would be cool if we could arrange to have a major release every 12 months,
> and point releases every 2-3 months. The exact intervals are les
Hi,
In your bibliography, you explain that you are now involved in HP's LSO.
I believe this is a very good point since Linux needs efficient hardware
support in the kernel and other applications (e.g. video cards).
As a consequence to this new job, you are "now more able to attend and
speak at Li
35 matches
Mail list logo
