On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 09:13:14PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I also remember it as Wichert describes, and I've been around since
> #debian was on a non-opn network.
So the people who asked me to leave #debian-devel when I wasn't yet a
developer somehow had a premonition of how much of a pai
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > * #debian-devel has always been a channel for Debian development. It
> > never was a channel restricted to just Debian developers
> This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
> Ask the people who were there years ago,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 09:13:14PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I also remember it as Wichert describes, and I've been around since
> #debian was on a non-opn network.
So the people who asked me to leave #debian-devel when I wasn't yet a
developer somehow had a premonition of how much of a pa
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > * #debian-devel has always been a channel for Debian development. It
> > never was a channel restricted to just Debian developers
> This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
> Ask the people who were there years ago,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:44:30PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> > This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
> > Ask the people who were there years ago, before you went by the nick
> > "wiggy".
>
> I was there when the channel was
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:14:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Who told you that? I was told in ~January 1996 that only developers
s/1996/1998/
Sorry about that.
> were allowed. When I became one (about that same time), I was allowed
> in without fuss.
--
G. Branden Robinson
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
> Ask the people who were there years ago, before you went by the nick
> "wiggy".
I was there when the channel was created actually (ok, maybe 1 or 2
days later).
Wichert.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
Now that the original proposer and 4 of the sponsors of this
GR have sent in statements supporting the withdrawal of this proposal,
this GR is now defunct.
manoj
- --
"Perhaps the best thing about the future is that it only comes one
d
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:15:07PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> In a email (message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>),
> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> withdrew his general resolution
> proposal. However, this GR was co-sponsored by six other developers,
> and I would like to hear from th
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 10:49:02AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> I am one of those people who was there when "wiggy" was "wichert", and
> I was told at the time that #dd was *not* restricted to developers.
Who told you that? I was told in ~January 1996 that only developers
were allowed. When I be
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:44:30PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> > This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
> > Ask the people who were there years ago, before you went by the nick
> > "wiggy".
>
> I was there when the channel wa
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:14:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Who told you that? I was told in ~January 1996 that only developers
s/1996/1998/
Sorry about that.
> were allowed. When I became one (about that same time), I was allowed
> in without fuss.
--
G. Branden Robinson
Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
> Ask the people who were there years ago, before you went by the nick
> "wiggy".
I was there when the channel was created actually (ok, maybe 1 or 2
days later).
Wichert.
--
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
Now that the original proposer and 4 of the sponsors of this
GR have sent in statements supporting the withdrawal of this proposal,
this GR is now defunct.
manoj
- --
"Perhaps the best thing about the future is that it only comes one
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:15:07PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> In a email (message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>),
> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> withdrew his general resolution
> proposal. However, this GR was co-sponsored by six other developers,
> and I would like to hear from t
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 10:49:02AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> I am one of those people who was there when "wiggy" was "wichert", and
> I was told at the time that #dd was *not* restricted to developers.
Who told you that? I was told in ~January 1996 that only developers
were allowed. When I b
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:15:07PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I would appreciate it if the sponsors would reply to
> debian-vote@lists.debian.org with a signed message indicating whether
> they are in agreement with withdrawing the support, or whether one or
> more of them would like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> In a email (message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>),
> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> withdrew his general resolution
> proposal. However, this GR was co-sponsored by six other developers,
> and I would like to hear from them what their inten
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:40:07PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
> Ask the people who were there years ago, before you went by the nick
> "wiggy".
I am one of those people who was there when "wiggy" was "wichert", and
I was t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> In a email (message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>),
> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> withdrew his general resolution
> proposal. However, this GR was co-sponsored by six other developers,
> and I would like to hear from them what their inten
Dans un message du 14 Nov à 10:23, Raphael Hertzog écrivait :
> I've decided to withdraw the general resolution proposed 2 weeks ago
> about IRC as communication channel.
I hereby withdraw my support to the GR.
--
Guillaume Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux is user friendly. Linux i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
In a email (message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>),
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> withdrew his general resolution
proposal. However, this GR was co-sponsored by six other developers,
and I would like to hear from them what their intentions are.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> * #debian-devel has always been a channel for Debian development. It
> never was a channel restricted to just Debian developers
This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
Ask the people who were there y
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:15:07PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I would appreciate it if the sponsors would reply to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a signed message indicating whether
> they are in agreement with withdrawing the support, or whether one or
> more of them would like to become
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> In a email (message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>),
> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> withdrew his general resolution
> proposal. However, this GR was co-sponsored by six other developers,
> and I would like to hear from them what their inte
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:40:07PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
> Ask the people who were there years ago, before you went by the nick
> "wiggy".
I am one of those people who was there when "wiggy" was "wichert", and
I was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> In a email (message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>),
> Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> withdrew his general resolution
> proposal. However, this GR was co-sponsored by six other developers,
> and I would like to hear from them what their inte
Dans un message du 14 Nov à 10:23, Raphael Hertzog écrivait :
> I've decided to withdraw the general resolution proposed 2 weeks ago
> about IRC as communication channel.
I hereby withdraw my support to the GR.
--
Guillaume Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux is user friendly. Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
In a email (message ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>),
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> withdrew his general resolution
proposal. However, this GR was co-sponsored by six other developers,
and I would like to hear from them what their intentions are.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:58:05PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> * #debian-devel has always been a channel for Debian development. It
> never was a channel restricted to just Debian developers
This simply is not true, as I've said over and over again elsewhere.
Ask the people who were there
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Because the most concerned people (Wichert as #debian-devel's channel
> founder and Branden as an operator) didn't want to participate in the
> discussion, not even respond to simple questions that would have let us
> continue the work.
Fact is that the last 2 w
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Because the most concerned people (Wichert as #debian-devel's channel
> founder and Branden as an operator) didn't want to participate in the
> discussion, not even respond to simple questions that would have let us
> continue the work.
Fact is that the last 2
[ Please respect the reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Hello,
first I'd like to thank the few people who have been constructive and
tried to help instead of denigrating and nitpicking on minor points.
I've decided to withdraw the general resolution proposed 2 weeks ago
about IRC as communication cha
[ Please respect the reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
Hello,
first I'd like to thank the few people who have been constructive and
tried to help instead of denigrating and nitpicking on minor points.
I've decided to withdraw the general resolution proposed 2 weeks ago
about IRC as communication ch
34 matches
Mail list logo
