>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Santiago> What exactly prevents an existing document to be re-issued?
Nothing, as long as the name is changed. IMHO if you reissue
something, as opposed to mohifying it (espescially because you do not
have the authority to modif
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This may be due to www.d.o having had a disk failure, Darren will have to
> check on that.
Ooh! Ooh!! Conspiracy!
;)
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:22:58PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
...a lot of stuff.
As far as I can tell though there weren't any actual solutions to the
problem suggested.
The problem is:
(a) A group of developers don't think the social contract can
legally (according to the co
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:10:17AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> The alias www.debian.org/Lists-Archives -> lists.debian.org in the apache
> configuration on master is missing, that's all.
>
> If you ask me, it's not worth the trouble putting it in again, people should
> switch to the new URL :)
Ex
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Santiago> What exactly prevents an existing document to be re-issued?
Nothing, as long as the name is changed. IMHO if you reissue
something, as opposed to mohifying it (espescially because you do not
have the authority to modi
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This may be due to www.d.o having had a disk failure, Darren will have to
> check on that.
Ooh! Ooh!! Conspiracy!
;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:22:58PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
...a lot of stuff.
As far as I can tell though there weren't any actual solutions to the
problem suggested.
The problem is:
(a) A group of developers don't think the social contract can
legally (according to the c
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 10:10:17AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> The alias www.debian.org/Lists-Archives -> lists.debian.org in the apache
> configuration on master is missing, that's all.
>
> If you ask me, it's not worth the trouble putting it in again, people should
> switch to the new URL :)
E
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:22:58PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > 5.Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements.
> >
> > These include documents describing the goals of the project, its
> > relationship with other free software entities, and nont
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, you wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:22:58PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > 5.Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements.
> >
> > These include documents describing the goals of the project, its
> > relationship with other free software entities, and non
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:22:58PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> 5.Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements.
>
> These include documents describing the goals of the project, its
> relationship with other free software entities, and nontechnical
> policies such as the free s
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:10:58PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > I wish to give everybody the chance to read the initial exchange and
> > > familiarize themselves with the issue again.
>
> > The URLs cited all return "Not Found". To "give everybody the
> > chance to read the initial e
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:22:58PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> 5.Issue nontechnical policy documents and statements.
>
> These include documents describing the goals of the project, its
> relationship with other free software entities, and nontechnical
> policies such as the free
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:10:58PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > I wish to give everybody the chance to read the initial exchange and
> > > familiarize themselves with the issue again.
>
> > The URLs cited all return "Not Found". To "give everybody the
> > chance to read the initial
14 matches
Mail list logo
