On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 08:27:43PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 03:19:38AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Non sequitur.
>
> If you must reply to every post, at least try to add something
> besides frivolous one-liners. They don't suit you at all.
Hmm, I always thoug
I hereby second this excellent amendment.
Date: 19 Jul 2000 18:18:47 -0500
In-Reply-To: Branden Robinson's message of "Wed, 19 Jul 2000 03:02:54 -0500"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 60
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/pl
I hereby second this excellent amendment.
Date: 19 Jul 2000 18:18:47 -0500
In-Reply-To: Branden Robinson's message of "Wed, 19 Jul 2000 03:02:54 -0500"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 60
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/p
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 03:19:38AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 09:04:37PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:32:23PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > E. That the disposition of the non-free areas in historical, released,
> > > and frozen Debian
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 02:43:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 12:23:27AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Given the continued lack of a reply, I shall assume that
> > there is indeed no need for the GR.
>
> Actually, it appears you have reached your conclusion a prior
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:01:27AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 08:00:16PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > G. Branden Robinson|It's not a matter of alienating authors.
> > Debian GNU/Linux |They have every right to license their
> > [EMA
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 03:19:38AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 09:04:37PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:32:23PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > E. That the disposition of the non-free areas in historical, released,
> > > and frozen Debian
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 02:43:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 12:23:27AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Given the continued lack of a reply, I shall assume that
> > there is indeed no need for the GR.
>
> Actually, it appears you have reached your conclusion a prio
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 09:04:37PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:32:23PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > E. That the disposition of the non-free areas in historical, released,
> > and frozen Debian Distrubutions and archives shall be determined per
> > the Debian Constitu
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 12:23:27AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Given the continued lack of a reply, I shall assume that
> there is indeed no need for the GR.
Actually, it appears you have reached your conclusion a priori the premise
you cited, so let's not play games.
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:01:27AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 08:00:16PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > G. Branden Robinson|It's not a matter of alienating authors.
> > Debian GNU/Linux |They have every right to license their
> > [EM
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 09:04:37PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:32:23PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > E. That the disposition of the non-free areas in historical, released,
> > and frozen Debian Distrubutions and archives shall be determined per
> > the Debian Constit
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 12:23:27AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Given the continued lack of a reply, I shall assume that
> there is indeed no need for the GR.
Actually, it appears you have reached your conclusion a priori the premise
you cited, so let's not play games.
--
G. Branden Robinson
13 matches
Mail list logo