On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 03:47:58PM -0700, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 08:29:03AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > For other ballots, I would be; for this one, I didn't find any discussion
> > necessary. I can't see why all discussion of a ballot must occur on the
> > debian-v
On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 08:29:03AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 12:17:16PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > I am not interested in the other discussion on this list.
> >
> > Then how can you possibly make an informed decision? Ok, the logo was
> > pretty simple (althou
On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 08:29:03AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 12:17:16PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > I am not interested in the other discussion on this list.
> >
> > Then how can you possibly make an informed decision? Ok, the logo was
> > pretty simple (althou
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 11:47:42AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Informed voting is a good thing. Votes based on random choice
> or without knowledge of the subject at hand may not be.
Of course. In general, discussion on ballots has occurred on debian-devel
in the past. Why the change
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 12:17:16PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > I am not interested in the other discussion on this list.
>
> Then how can you possibly make an informed decision? Ok, the logo was
> pretty simple (although discussion about why certain candidates would
> not make good logos was
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 05:58:21PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 02:36:20AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > I think it takes < 1 minute about once a week to click on a bookmark
> > to bring up a relatively simple page to check if there is an active
> > proposal. If you'd
On 10-Jun-99, 02:58 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately it is all too easy for CFVs to get lost on this mailing list.
:0:
* Subject:.*CFV
Mail/voteannounce
> I would prefer it remained an announce list, or that CFVs were also sent
> to debian-devel-announce.
I too
Hi,
Distressingly, I find that people in this discussion seem to
have the attitude that in some way people are obligated to feed them
information about votes, policy changes, etc, and that they have a
right to be involved in everything Debian does.
This is a voluneteer organiz
Hi,
>>"Hamish" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hamish> Unfortunately it is all too easy for CFVs to get lost on this
Hamish> mailing list. I would prefer it remained an announce list,
Hamish> or that CFVs were also sent to debian-devel-announce. I am
Hamish> not interested in th
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 02:36:20AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> I think it takes < 1 minute about once a week to click on a bookmark
> to bring up a relatively simple page to check if there is an active
> proposal. If you'd rather get it via e-mail, subscribe to debian-vote.
Unfortunately it is
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 02:36:20AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 10-Jun-99, 00:25 (CDT), Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hey, you now they are some countries where you are fined if you don't
> > show to vote, i think they believe that voting is an obligation not a
> > right.
>
On 10-Jun-99, 00:25 (CDT), Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, you now they are some countries where you are fined if you don't
> show to vote, i think they believe that voting is an obligation not a
> right.
As a totally off-topic point, I completely disagree with that concept.
> Yes
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 01:05:35PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 08-Jun-99, 14:51 (CDT), Stephen Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I totally agree, I wasn't even aware there was a vote going on until I
> > saw someone talking about it on IRC. I'm not not on -devel, there is
> > way too m
13 matches
Mail list logo
