Re: Relatively boring bullseye upgrade reports

2021-08-18 Thread Celejar
tuff) No issues at all; the only hassle was dealing with the questions about whether or not to install new configuration files (and manually copy over any changes I've made to the old ones). Celejar

Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums

2021-09-29 Thread Celejar
rejected should receive at least some sort of explanation for the decision to reject it? I respect your opinion, but I would have assumed that basic courtesy and civility, and the open source ethos in general, suggest otherwise. Celejar

Re: iTunesSetup.exe in wine?

2021-10-06 Thread Celejar
've used it for other things, not iTunes, but it has worked quite well for me, and it can be simpler and less intimidating than straight Wine. > This link lists a few more options which I'd not heard of until I went > looking for the name of Crossover: > > https://alternativeto.net/software/wine/?platform=linux Celejar

Re: [Sid] Firefox problem

2021-10-18 Thread Celejar
message from Firefox, despite the fact that the program is (mostly) functional. ###!!! [Child][RunMessage] Error: Channel closing: too late to send/recv, messages will be lost Celejar

Re: Recs for new Linux laptop? (to replace Zareason)

2021-11-09 Thread Celejar
the years. They always seem a bit > > > pricey, but I'm willing to bite the bullet now if I have to--I'm getting > > > too old to waste time on problem installations now. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -Tom > > > Celejar

Re: PAM two factors authentication

2021-11-13 Thread Celejar
gt; I can say that I follow: > https://support.yubico.com/hc/en-us/articles/360016649099-Ubuntu-Linux-Login-Guide-U2F > and I can use my ubikey (I believe its u2f application) to login/unlock. And see: https://wiki.debian.org/Security/U2F (I've written bits of that page.) > KJ Celejar

Re: PAM two factors authentication

2021-11-14 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 07:19:21 + (UTC) André Rodier wrote: > > 14 Nov 2021 00:55:25 Celejar : > > > On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 19:13:27 +0100 > > Kamil Jońca wrote: > > > >> André Rodier writes: > >> > >>> Hello all, > >>&

Re: Use one of many second factors authentication on PAM

2021-11-14 Thread Celejar
gt; > Any idea ? I think you need to look into the details of PAM stacking. See here: https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/638466 for a discussion of something similar to what you want to do (although you'll have to adapt it to your specific preferences), and here for more information: https://developer.ibm.com/tutorials/l-pam/ Celejar

Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-26 Thread Celejar
ont installed, or do they see tofu? Anyway, TIL something fascinating. Now that I have Noto Color Emoji installed, my email is much more colorful and cuter - Sylph apparently wasn't displaying tofu for emojis in email subject lines, and was just ignoring them, and I had no idea what I was missing ;) ... Celejar

Re: tofu - was -Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-26 Thread Celejar
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:06:01 +0800 Bret Busby wrote: > On 27/11/21 2:11 am, Tixy wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-11-26 at 12:36 -0500, Celejar wrote: > >> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 + > >> Jonathan Dowland wrote: > >> > >> ... > >> >

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-27 Thread Celejar
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 12:29:33 +0100 "Sijmen J. Mulder" wrote: > Celejar : > > I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA > > software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font > > installed, or do they see tofu? > > I

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-27 Thread Celejar
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 23:41:37 +0100 Linux-Fan wrote: > Nate Bargmann writes: > > > * On 2021 26 Nov 11:36 -0600, Celejar wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 + > > > Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > > > > ... > > > > >

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-27 Thread Celejar
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 07:22:45 -0600 John Hasler wrote: > Celejar writes: > > I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA > > software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have such a font > > installed, or do they see tofu? > > I use Gnus. I

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-27 Thread Celejar
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 01:32:51 +0100 Michael Lange wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:36:04 -0500 > Celejar wrote: > > (...) > > I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA > > software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have su

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-27 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:50:29 -0600 Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2021 26 Nov 11:36 -0600, Celejar wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 10:43:16 + > > Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > 👱🏻Jonathan Dowland > > > ✎ j...@debi

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-27 Thread Celejar
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:28:05 -0500 The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-11-27 at 21:08, Celejar wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:50:29 -0600 > > Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > >> * On 2021 26 Nov 11:36 -0600, Celejar wrote: > > >>> I finally got tir

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-27 Thread Celejar
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 21:00:35 -0600 John Hasler wrote: > Celejar writes: > > What does fc-list | grep noto return? > > 272 lines. Sorry - see my other message in this thread. So you clearly have the Noto fonts installed. They're not essential packages, so something you

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-28 Thread Celejar
ou "never manually installed any emoji fonts (or any other fonts)." Celejar

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-28 Thread Celejar
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:58:58 -0600 David Wright wrote: > On Sat 27 Nov 2021 at 07:22:45 (-0600), John Hasler wrote: > > Celejar writes: > > > I'm curious: do most users of Debian on the desktop (who use MUA > > > software, as opposed to webmail via a browser) have

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-28 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 12:38:19 -0600 John Hasler wrote: > I wrote: > > Do you have the "fonts-recommended" package installed? > > Celejar writes: > > No, I had never heard of it. Do you? > > Yes. > > > No, I had never heard of it. Do you? No pack

Re: Emoji fonts in Debian [WAS:] Re: How to NOT automatically mount a specific partition of an external device?

2021-11-28 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 14:11:27 -0600 John Hasler wrote: > Celejar writes: > > ...or even "recommends" that one... > > I wrote: > > How do you know? > > Celejar writes: > > $ apt-cache rdepends fonts-recommended > > fonts-recommended > > R

Re: Identity Theft

2021-12-21 Thread Celejar
s.net/2020/09/20/umatrix-development-has-ended/ 2) Android uBlock is indeed on the official list of Firefox Recommended Extensions: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/4757633/7dfae8669acc4312a65e8ba5553036/ Celejar

Re: [OT] sending command to multiple SSH sessions, like in mRemoteNG

2021-12-30 Thread Celejar
/automatically-run-commands-over-ssh-on-many-servers Celejar

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com

2022-01-04 Thread Celejar
le. Some people have *millions* of domains blacklisted in Pi-hole: https://www.reddit.com/r/pihole/comments/rrcmfk/why_am_i_making_a_personal_commitment_to_donating/ https://www.reddit.com/r/pihole/comments/7rzdzj/how_many_domains_do_you_have_on_your_setup/ https://www.reddit.com/r/pihole/comments/hkfyu4/domains_on_blocklist/ etc. and using DoH with Pi-hole is well documented: https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/dns/cloudflared/ https://medium.com/codex/pi-hole-and-doh-f1a9f8acd0f7 https://github.com/devopsleigh/pihole Celejar

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com

2022-01-05 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 06:10:48 +0100 wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 04:05:11PM -0500, Celejar wrote: > > [...] > > > One way "to combine DoH with resolving 14,000 addresses to 127.0.0.1" > > is by using Pi-hole. Some people have *millions* of domains blackl

Re: Thunderbird not allowing local accounts

2022-01-05 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 09:44:24 -0500 "Paul M. Foster" wrote: ... > Thanks for the info. Mozilla Foundation is seriously annoying me lately. > > Can anyone recommend another MUA which uses mbox format and is > relatively easy to configure? Sylpheed? Celejar

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com

2022-01-05 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 18:20:23 +0100 wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:43:23AM -0500, Celejar wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 06:10:48 +0100 > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 04:05:11PM -0500, Celejar wrote: > > > > > > [...] >

Re: Thunderbird not allowing local accounts

2022-01-05 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:28:55 -0500 wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:58:09 -0500 > Celejar wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 09:44:24 -0500 > > "Paul M. Foster" wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > Thanks for the info. Mozilla Foundation is s

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Firefox: Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead for the USPS.com

2022-01-05 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:42:33 +0100 wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:41:23PM -0500, Celejar wrote: > > [...] > > > The configuration I'm talking about is as follows: the browser makes > > ordinary, unencrypted DNS requests to the Pi-hole, over a trusted > >

Re: Thunderbird not allowing local accounts

2022-01-05 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:33:36 -0800 cono...@rahul.net (John Conover) wrote: > pa...@quillandmouse.com writes: > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 11:58:09 -0500 > > Celejar wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 09:44:24 -0500 > > > "Paul M. Foster" wrote: &g

Re: Thunderbird not allowing local accounts

2022-01-06 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 06 Jan 2022 09:26:16 +0100 didier gaumet wrote: > > > Le mercredi 05 janvier 2022 à 11:58 -0500, Celejar a écrit : > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 09:44:24 -0500 > > "Paul M. Foster" wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > Thanks for the info

Re: Thunderbird not allowing local accounts

2022-01-06 Thread Celejar
hose MUAs that do not support > oauth2 access services which require it. And there's also this, although I have not used it and don't know how well it works: https://github.com/simonrob/email-oauth2-proxy Celejar

Re: odd question re man pages

2022-01-07 Thread Celejar
ole that I can > find. If you're using xfce4-terminal, look at xfce4-terminal's Edit / Preferences / Advanced / Shortcuts / Disable menu shortcut key (F10 by default) Celejar

Re: Please take this as constructive

2022-01-18 Thread Celejar
. > > Wonder no longer :). Acquaint yourself with netcat. How is netcat going to help if there's no networking on one machine? And if there is (e.g., using a wired connection), then netcat isn't really necessary, since the machine connected to the internet can be configured to route packets to the other one. Celejar

Re: /home partition filling immediately after recent sid upgrade

2021-03-12 Thread Celejar
; filled. > > > > I find "du | sort -n" useful in such situations. Start at /home and > > work your way down. > > My personal favorite: > > du -hx --max-depth=1 | sort -h As someone else mentioned in this thread, 'ncdu' is very convenient for disk usage exploration, due to its interactive, navigable interface. Celejar

Re: Bug: missing package

2021-03-15 Thread Celejar
e: https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/frobtads https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=frobtads&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all Celejar

Re: [?] Why should Distros be called as i386 for a 32-bit PC, and as amd64 for a 64-bit PC, when Intel Core PCs are also 64bit systems

2021-03-15 Thread Celejar
ately due to its openness and non-x86ness: https://www.osnews.com/story/133093/review-blackbird-secure-desktop-a-fully-open-source-modern-power9-workstation-without-any-proprietary-code/ Of course, Raptor seems to be a tiny player, and it's hard to see how they'll get any traction since the pricing isn't very competitive, apparently at least in part due to the chicken-and-egg market share problem, but it's an exciting development to watch. Celejar

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

2021-03-16 Thread Celejar
with Google. And I do usually access Google without being logged in, with most cookies blocked, NoScript, etc., so in general it has much less (not zero, of course) "context" with regard to me than it does in general. Celejar

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

2021-03-16 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:02:19 +0100 wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > [...] > > > You've been making some very interesting points here about the key > > being context, but I'm not sure I totally buy it. DDG simply doesn'

Re: Markdown previewer

2021-03-17 Thread Celejar
es.debian.org/buster/pandoc) can do that for you with a > > > simple "pandoc -o README.html README.md" or "pandoc -o README.pdf > > > README.md" etc. > > > > Or, at the other end of the spectrum, you might like to try out Typora. > > Cheers! > > Looks nice, thank you. I did not quite understand however, is it a > commercial software, non-free? Yes: https://support.typora.io/License-Agreement/ https://snapcraft.io/typora Celejar

Re: Markdown previewer

2021-03-17 Thread Celejar
script. This can be done quickly without pushing code to Github. This is pretty much what I use - I have the following snippet in .config/mc/mc.ext : # Markdown shell/i/.md View=pandoc %f | lynx -stdin Not quite a GUI, but close ;) Celejar

Re: Social-media antipathy (was Re: How i can optimize my operating system?)

2021-03-17 Thread Celejar
it's closed source, so we can't know for sure what's really in there, and I certainly won't use it, but as far as anyone knows, it is the real deal: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whatsapp#End-to-end_encryption https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/04/whatsapp-is-now-most-widely-used-end-to-end-crypto-tool-on-the-planet/ Celejar

Re: Social-media antipathy (was Re: How i can optimize my operating system?)

2021-03-18 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:28:06 +0100 wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:54:24PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:45:28 +0100 > > wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 09:24:50AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > ... > >

Re: Social-media antipathy (was Re: How i can optimize my operating system?)

2021-03-18 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:25:48 +0100 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:07:08AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > [...] > > > I definitely share your concerns about Facebook (although perhaps not > > quite your vehemence), > > :-) > > >

Re: Social-media antipathy (was Re: How i can optimize my operating system?)

2021-03-18 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:49:27 -0300 riveravaldez wrote: > I'm getting pretty confuse with these statements. > > On 3/18/21, Celejar wrote: > > (...) > > I definitely share your concerns about Facebook (although perhaps not > > quite your vehemence), but making **

Re: Social-media antipathy (was Re: How i can optimize my operating system?)

2021-03-18 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:53:13 -0300 riveravaldez wrote: > On 3/18/21, Celejar wrote: ... > > (...) The bottom line: no, I don't "know" that WhatsApp is secure, but > > neither do I "know" that anything I run is. (...) > > To put it simply, I can&

Re: how to record sound to mp3

2021-03-25 Thread Celejar
where a simple 'cat' won't work - I use its 'concat demuxer' regularly to contatenate MP4 files (Android starts a new video file when a 4GB limit is hit): https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Concatenate Celejar

Re: xsane can't see Brother ADS-2700W scanner

2021-03-31 Thread Celejar
d some trouble getting xsane to find my networked Brother HL-2280DW. I eventually got it to work by adding "brother4" to /etc/sane.d/dll.conf, following the directions from the ArchWiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/SANE/Scanner-specific_problems#Network_Scanning Celejar

Re: Converting markdown to PDF

2021-04-01 Thread Celejar
x27;s packaging tools or > similar... :-) 'apt-file search pdflatex' 'apt-file' is in the 'apt-file' package - it keeps a local database, which one updates periodically / occasionally via 'apt-file update'. Celejar

Re: Temporary failure in name resolution

2021-04-04 Thread Celejar
ain name server. A notable class of exceptions is that of OpenWrt powered devices: OpenWrt comes with dnsmasq configured out of the box, and thus provides caching. Celejar

Modern best practice for putting a contact email on the web

2021-04-05 Thread Celejar
inst current bots? http://www.wbwip.com/wbw/emailencoder.html Celejar

Re: Modern best practice for putting a contact email on the web

2021-04-05 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote: > Celejar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email > > address on the web while avoiding having it scraped by spam / fraud > > bots? > > Assum

Re: Modern best practice for putting a contact email on the web

2021-04-05 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:36:39 +0100 Joe wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:49:15 -0400 > Celejar wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400 > > Dan Ritter wrote: > > > > > Celejar wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > >

Re: Modern best practice for putting a contact email on the web

2021-04-05 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote: > Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400 > > Dan Ritter wrote: > > > > > Celejar wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > What's the recommended modern bes

Re: Modern best practice for putting a contact email on the web

2021-04-05 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:57:50 +0100 Joe wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:10:05 -0400 > Celejar wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:36:39 +0100 > > Joe wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:49:15 -0400 > > > Celejar wrote: > > > > >

Re: Modern best practice for putting a contact email on the web

2021-04-05 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 05 Apr 2021 16:50:30 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote: > Celejar [2021-04-05 14:49:15] wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:12:07 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote: > >> Celejar wrote: > >> > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email >

Re: Modern best practice for putting a contact email on the web

2021-04-05 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 19:39:43 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote: > Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400 > > Dan Ritter wrote: > > > > > > Okay, but why isn't trying to limit spammers getting hold of an address > > > > a logical part of a

Re: Modern best practice for putting a contact email on the web

2021-04-05 Thread Celejar
ction. I just haven't been able to figure out how much of a "standard" it actually is. Some RFCs (e.g., https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5233) acknowledge it as existing ("On email systems that allow for 'subaddressing' or 'detailed addressing' (e.g., "ken+si...@example.org") ..."), but it doesn't seem to be a formal standard. Celejar

Re: Modern best practice for putting a contact email on the web

2021-04-06 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:31:29 +0500 "Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote: > On 06.04.2021 01:14, Celejar wrote: > >> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:51:28 -0400 > >> Dan Ritter wrote: > >> Because it doesn't work. If it worked as well as, say, moving your >

Re: ubuntu/snap future

2021-04-06 Thread Celejar
tu is it uses way too much snaps and I do not think it is a > > matter of laziness. > > I had occasion to install Zoom a few weeks ago;'snap install zoom-client'. > Everything went smoothly and I quite like having this proprietary package > strictly confined. 'apt install zoom_amd64.deb' goes smoothly as well. Confinement is certainly a good thing - I'll have to look into whether the snap route is preferable to the firejail solution that I currently use. Celejar

Re: Modern best practice for putting a contact email on the web

2021-04-06 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 08:18:29 +0200 wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:07:20AM +0900, 황병희 wrote: > > Hellow, > > > > Celejar writes: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > What's the recommended modern best practice for putting a contact email &

Re: ubuntu/snap future

2021-04-09 Thread Celejar
may rely upon system libraries and other dependencies, which is good, insofar as everything works, but it will also have more of a chance to mess with the system (even if only accidentally). Celejar

Re: ubuntu/snap future

2021-04-09 Thread Celejar
e of these. A third solution to consider: firejail (I use Zoom firejailed) Celejar

Re: ubuntu/snap future

2021-04-09 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 14:51:29 +0200 wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 08:02:46AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:21:49 +0200 > > wrote: > > [...] > > > > Can you pose one concrete use case where it is unavoidable? > > > > What a

Re: ubuntu/snap future

2021-04-09 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 15:39:23 +0200 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:28:15AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > [...] > > > Sorry, I meant NextCloud > > I see. I kept myself confusing those two for a while. > > AFAIK it's packaged in Debian? Too

Re: ubuntu/snap future

2021-04-09 Thread Celejar
uot;the easiest way to install Nextcloud on a web space" * Appliance, i.e., a pre-built VM, "designed to be an easy way for less technical users to get Nextcloud up and running or to test it out" (so perhaps only one level of containerization, not Docker on top of a VM, as per another part of this thread) Celejar

Re: ubuntu/snap future

2021-04-09 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 20:48:01 +0300 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Vi, 09 apr 21, 08:02:46, Celejar wrote: > > > > What about cases where the software simply isn't in Debian at all? > > Recently, I've used IntelliJ IDEA and Android Studio, and I'd like to > &

Re: ubuntu/snap future

2021-04-09 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 09 Apr 2021 21:30:45 +0200 Linux-Fan wrote: > Celejar writes: > > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 20:48:01 +0300 > > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > > On Vi, 09 apr 21, 08:02:46, Celejar wrote: > > > > What about cases where the software simply isn&#x

Can't connect to torproject.org

2021-04-11 Thread Celejar
gestions for fixing this in my case. I have a pretty standard Debian installation, with standard certificates installed, and no customization to my local certificate infrastructure. I'm connecting via Verizon FioS, with no proxy in use (on my end, at least). Celejar

Re: Can't connect to torproject.org

2021-04-11 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 07:55:41 -0700 Kushal Kumaran wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11 2021 at 10:25:24 AM, Celejar wrote: > > I feel silly for not being able to figure this out. > > > > I can't connect to torproject.org via either Firefox or Chromium. The > > browsers objec

Re: Can't connect to torproject.org

2021-04-11 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:32:10 +0200 wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:25:24AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > I feel silly for not being able to figure this out. > > > > I can't connect to torproject.org via either Firefox or Chromium. The > > browsers object that

[Solved] Re: Can't connect to torproject.org

2021-04-11 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 12:51:13 -0300 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > On 11/04/2021 11:25, Celejar wrote: > > I feel silly for not being able to figure this out. > > > > I can't connect to torproject.org via either Firefox or Chromium. The > > browsers object that

Re: [Solved] Re: Can't connect to torproject.org

2021-04-11 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 18:51:20 +0200 wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:16:55PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 12:51:13 -0300 > > Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > [...] > > > > What happens when you try to access https://letsencrypt.org/, whic

Firefox HTTPS-only mode breaks sites that return 404 for HTTPS connections

2021-04-14 Thread Celejar
://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25121604 Celejar

Re: Firefox HTTPS-only mode breaks sites that return 404 for HTTPS connections

2021-04-14 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 22:57:01 +0100 piorunz wrote: > On 14/04/2021 17:19, Celejar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I recently switched to Firefox's native HTTPS-Only mode from the > > HTTPS Everywhere extension, and I've just made the nasty discovery that > > a

Re: Firefox HTTPS-only mode breaks sites that return 404 for HTTPS connections

2021-04-14 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 16:01:13 -0300 riveravaldez wrote: > On 4/14/21, Celejar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I recently switched to Firefox's native HTTPS-Only mode from the > > HTTPS Everywhere extension, and I've just made the nasty discovery that > > a

Re: Firefox HTTPS-only mode breaks sites that return 404 for HTTPS connections

2021-04-15 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:16:59 +0100 piorunz wrote: > On 15/04/2021 03:15, Celejar wrote: > > >> It certainly works fine for me. I use https only mode for many months > >> now. Can you bring an example of a page which returns good page on http, > >> but

Re: Firefox HTTPS-only mode breaks sites that return 404 for HTTPS connections

2021-04-15 Thread Celejar
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:31:11 -0300 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > On 15/04/2021 09:12, Celejar wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:16:59 +0100 > > piorunz wrote: > > > >> On 15/04/2021 03:15, Celejar wrote: > >> > >>> http://www.daat.ac

localhost web apps and cookie blocking

2021-04-16 Thread Celejar
ookie store ("Manage Cookies and Site Data") doesn't show any cookies stored from any site other than localhost.) This doesn't seem to be an issue for normal web sites, where whitelisting the website is (generally?) sufficient to get the sites to work. What am I missing? Celejar

[Solved] Re: localhost web apps and cookie blocking

2021-04-16 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:26:36 +0300 Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:45:13AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > I have various web (HTTP, not HTTPS) apps (e.g., pi-hole, Home > > Assistant) running on localhost (either actually on localhost, or on > > an

Re: [Solved] Re: localhost web apps and cookie blocking

2021-04-16 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 12:42:14 -0400 Dan Ritter wrote: > Celejar wrote: > > Interesting. I thought my usecase was a pretty straightforward one - I > > have various typical home user services that I have no intention of > > making available on the public internet, so I

Re: installing two versions of a user application

2021-04-23 Thread Celejar
irtualization. LXC (or some sort of chroot solution) in particular might be a good fit here - you get a separate filesystem, without the overhead of a full VM, which shouldn't be necessary in this case. Celejar

Re: installing two versions of a user application

2021-04-23 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:07:02 +0100 Morgan Read wrote: > On 23/04/2021 5:40 pm, Celejar wrote: > > I'll defer to those with a better understanding of the debian packaging > > system internals, and it may depend on the details of the package, but > > I'm pretty sure

Re: installing two versions of a user application

2021-04-23 Thread Celejar
data archives: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deb_%28file_format%29 If both control archive files are using a package name of "master-pdf-editor", you can try Stefan's suggestion of renaming one and seeing if they'll then coinstall. Celejar

Re: pci 0000:00:01:0: MSI quirk detected; subordinated MSI disabled ...

2021-04-24 Thread Celejar
uot; to false in "about:config" - no extensions required. Celejar

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

2021-04-28 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:02:19 +0100 wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > [...] > > > You've been making some very interesting points here about the key > > being context, but I'm not sure I totally buy it. DDG simply doesn'

Re: Google vs. DDG

2021-04-28 Thread Celejar
tween Bing and Google. Technically they could probably just as > well rely on Google (or on both). FWIW, Bing doesn't find the Thetis homepage either, so that supports your point. Celejar

Re: Google vs. DDG

2021-04-28 Thread Celejar
e DDG, certainly for its attitude and track record of taking privacy seriously, as well as for doing remarkably well as a competitor to Google with what I assume is a tiny fraction of its resources. Celejar

Re: Google vs. DDG

2021-04-28 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:07:42 +0100 mick crane wrote: > On 2021-04-28 16:05, Celejar wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:02:19 +0100 > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> &g

Re: Google vs. DDG (was: Social-media antipathy)

2021-04-29 Thread Celejar
a site-by-site basis, which I have to do with uBlock Origin anyway, since it also breaks (in medium mode) a fair amount of the web). Celejar

Re: how to use fetchmail with MS Office 365 / davmail?

2021-04-30 Thread Celejar
cently, and I think there's a third, very important but subtle reason why 2FA + application specific passwords are (or at least can be) more secure than the classic password model: the application specific password can be limited to grant permission to access the account *data*, but will not grant permission to alter account settings, so the account cannot be totally hijacked the way it can be with classic passwords if they ever get compromised. Celejar

Re: IPFS tools not in the repos?

2021-05-04 Thread Celejar
ely because nobody found it useful enough and also because > it is go and js based which are not really friendly for packaging with > their tendency to introduce the dependency hell. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779893 Celejar

Re: URGENT..! Very annoying when UPDATE = debian.map.fastlydns.net

2021-05-06 Thread Celejar
t. Browsers > are getting more useless at each minor version, it seems :-( In Firefox, "Tools / Browser Tools / Web Developer Tools / Network" shows the 500 status code. Celejar

Re: Kismet old version in debian

2021-05-07 Thread Celejar
se allow > me > to suggest, to add kismet-2020-12-R3 to the debian repo. > > Does anyone agree? Not agree? Someone agrees: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987577 Celejar

Re: PC fan getting very loud because of CPU load

2021-05-09 Thread Celejar
.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/mu2qcm/indefinitely_increasing_blocked_elements/ I'm not sure that I would interpret this sort of thing as the website putting up an aggressive fight or deliberately trying to burn out anyone's computer, but it is an annoyance that one sometimes encounters. Celejar

Re: Signed Email PAM authentication

2021-05-14 Thread Celejar
ry skilled hobbyist, so it's strictly amateur-hour stuff, and undoubtedly horribly insecure, and in any event, it doesn't use the PAM framework, so I doubt it'll be of much use to you, but it was a somewhat similar idea ... https://sourceforge.net/projects/mailmin/ Celejar

Re: Debian-friendly laptop

2021-05-19 Thread Celejar
keyboard have failed? Who knows ... My previous main machine had been a T60. I gave that up when its keyboard failed. I know that one of the main selling points of ThinkPads is their keyboards: they are certainly very good, but apparently they don't last forever ;) Celejar

Re: Debian-friendly laptop

2021-05-19 Thread Celejar
don't think they make laptops): https://www.osnews.com/story/133093/review-blackbird-secure-desktop-a-fully-open-source-modern-power9-workstation-without-any-proprietary-code/ Celejar

Re: Debian-friendly laptop

2021-05-19 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 19 May 2021 17:27:16 +0300 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 19 mai 21, 07:58:05, Celejar wrote: > > > > My previous main machine had been a T60. I gave that up when its > > keyboard failed. I know that one of the main selling points of > > ThinkPads is their ke

Re: Debian-friendly laptop

2021-05-19 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 19 May 2021 18:32:56 +0300 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Mi, 19 mai 21, 11:06:44, Celejar wrote: > > On Wed, 19 May 2021 17:27:16 +0300 > > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > > On Mi, 19 mai 21, 07:58:05, Celejar wrote: > > > > > > > > M

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >