Re: libc.so.5 the stuff from non-free requires

1996-06-06 Thread branderh
essions living under one roof" D.E. Knuth Erick Branderhorst http://www.iaehv.nl/users/branderh/

Re: program to check *.deb

1996-06-06 Thread branderh
p://www.iaehv.nl/users/branderh/

Re: color ls

1996-08-05 Thread branderh
> hmm ok well i have checked 5 sites now and fileutils-3.12-4.deb IS the > newer version. if i am wrong about this please tell where there is a newer > version. Check unstable for 3.13-3, if not found try a few days later. Erick

Re: color ls

1996-08-05 Thread branderh
> Shouldn't it both conflict and replace color-ls, so that color-ls gets > completely overwritten when the new fileutils it replaced? Otherwise stuff > like /usr/doc/copyright/color-ls (for instance) won't get removed... And > dpkg -l will still show a color-ls package. done in 3.13-3 Erick

Re: fileutils 3.13-3 seems to be messed up

1996-08-12 Thread branderh
> I just installed fileutils 3.13-3, and now my 'ls' is screwed up. I ls isn't screwed up. RTFM. > removed color-ls as it said I was supposed to. I remember reading about > how color-ls is now included in fileutils. However there is no color-ls > file in my /usr/bin directory anymore, there

Re: des encryption..

1996-08-12 Thread branderh
> Can we please put /opt -> /usr/opt and the empty /opt tree in the base > package, before things get any worse ? > > Also I propose to mandate in the policy manual that packages which use > /opt should provide appropriate links or files in > /opt/{bin,lib,man,include,info,doc} and that packages w

Re: fileutils 3.13-3 seems to be messed up

1996-08-12 Thread branderh
> eval `dircolors -b /usr/local/etc/colour-ls.rc` > alias ls='ls --color=auto '; > alias dir='ls --color=auto --format=vertical'; > alias vdir='ls --color=auto --format=long'; > Erick, is there a way that you can persuade/hack dircolors to do what the old > one did? Or put a note i

Re: Where is the kernel-package package?

1996-08-15 Thread branderh
> > what is kernel-package? a bunch of script to make building your own kernel easier. Erick

Re: texbin postinst in unstable fails

1996-09-14 Thread branderh
> > > C'est manfnt.mf. Install mfbasfnt-1.0-3 de "buzz-fixed" et ca ira. On peut installer mfbasfnt-1.0-7 aussi, mais c'est dans Incoming maintenant. One can also install mfbasfnt-1.0-7, but it is in Incoming right now. > Merci! Ca marche maintenant. > > Translation: Thanks, now it works :-)

Re: teTeX (was Re: dvips top margin)

1996-09-21 Thread branderh
> I installed Debian for the first time two weeks ago and didn't even bother > to install the Debian LaTeX system because i already knew teTeX from > another platform and installed this instantly in the /usr/local/* > hierarchie. To my mind teTeX is the most up to date and most easy to > install an

Re: LaTeX

1996-09-24 Thread branderh
> A format file is a binary version of a TeX-macro collection. First of all you > should get the macros themself: Hookup to the net and then type > ncftp ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/macros/latex/base.tar.gz > This works because those FTP-servers pack and compress directory trees. > Maybe you'll

Re: teTeX (was Re: dvips top margin)

1996-09-25 Thread branderh
> >> Is this still Debian related? > bigl> think that any "censorship" should be used very careful. > > Especially when the previous posts were about the shortcomings of the > Debian LaTeX system and merits of a LaTeX distribution that is a > potential debian package. Such a debian package will