On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> Anyone know why I get this:
>
> $ dpkg-query --list vim-athena
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
> |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: upper
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:33:27PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>
>> Anyone know why I get this:
>>
>> $ dpkg-query --list vim-athena
>> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
>> |
>> Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-ins
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/2/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>
>> Anyone know why I get this:
>>
>> $ dpkg-query --list vim-athena
>> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
>> |
>> Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
>> |/
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/2/13, Tom H wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyone know why I get this:
>>>
>>> $ dpkg-query --list vim-athena
>>> Desired=Unknown/In
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Csanyi Pal wrote:
> Tom H writes:
>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>>
>> Have you run "apt-get update" and {,dist-}upgraded?
>>
>> Are you using pinning? Are the liborc-* packages pinned to testing
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Curt wrote:
> On 2013-09-02, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> AFAICT, the "un" output of "-l" for vim-athena is because it's listed
>> in the "Recommends" field of vim-common, so it's recognized as a
>> pa
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/3/13, Curt wrote:
>> On 2013-09-02, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> AFAICT, the "un" output of "-l" for vim-athena is because it's listed
>>> in the "Recommends" field o
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Curt wrote:
> On 2013-09-02, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Then vim-dbg and chromium-browser-dbg should also get "un...".
>
> Where or how do you get "no package description" for those packages?
> What command are you using?
d
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Curt wrote:
> On 2013-09-02, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>
>> I actually thought the same for a bit, but apt-cache show vim-athena
>> seems to show description just fine.
>
> Well, I'm not getting the same output as you for the same packages, and
> it's not the packag
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Curt wrote:
> On 2013-09-02, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> Where or how do you get "no package description" for those packages?
>>> What command are you using?
>>
>> dpkg -l
>
> curty@einstein:~$ dpkg -l vim-
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Curt wrote:
> On 2013-09-02, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>> Does "apt-cache show vim-common" list vim-athena on the "Recommends:" line?
>>
> Yes it does. It also shows vim-gnome. So I only see one pattern here,
> although
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Anyone know why ip tuntap del requires the "mode"?
>
> # ifconfig tapz
> tapz: error fetching interface information: Device not found
> # ip tuntap add mode tap tapz
> # ifconfig tapz
> tapz Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 06:b8:f7:41:bf:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:55:51PM +0530, Anubhav Yadav wrote:
>
> This was already mentioned. The answer is ctrl+alt+f1 through
> ctrl+alt+f6 by default. Let me clarify. Unlike in some other
> distributions (slackware comes to mind), there i
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Regid Ichira wrote:
>
> I find it useful to have the kernel configuration automatically
> pointing out only the NEW kernel configuration options. Quite often,
> the kernel's
>
> $ make oldconfig
>
> takes a long time. In particular, when I am trying to find ou
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:16 AM, lina wrote:
>
> I do not want to start some program, such as apache server, during reboot,
>
> shall I simply remove it from /etc/init.d/ ?
>
> haha ... is it a bit brutal? or lack elegance?
"update-rc.d disable" will do this properly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>
> Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/ xfce DE.
>
> With great embarrassment, after stoutly defending nm, eth0 no longer
> connects. This only happens when I run wheezy. The connection is fine
> when I run the other distros on the hd
ections.
>
> Do you mean the yes pipe that Tom H was
> referring to ealier in this thread? But you can not get a thoughtful
> config file by that manner. I mean, I don't want a kernel with lots
> of features I don't need. And I am trying to both config the kernel
> AND lea
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:48:03PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>>>
>>> Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/ xfce DE.
>>>
>>> With great embarrassment, after stoutly defendin
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:47:10AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>>>
>>> Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/ xfce DE.
>>>
>>> With gr
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:15:35AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:48:03P
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:15:35AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:48:03PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 10,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:04 AM, laurent debian
wrote:
>
> Sorry stan but this is ... not helping.
> Maybe I should rephrase my question.
> Is there any chance that the build I perform can [Experience Kernel oops due
> to the ] lack [of] some firmwares ?
> Le 12/09/2013 03:00, Stan Hoeppner a éc
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:50 PM, John W. Foster wrote:
>
> How to get rid of these messages;
>
> System is working fine, but I get these now and then when installing or
> uninstalling debian apps
>
>> insserv: Script ETH1START is broken: incomplete LSB comment.
>> insserv: missing `Default-Stop:'
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:14:07AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:47:10AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What'
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Dom wrote:
> On 15/09/13 08:58, thunders...@loop.de wrote:
>>
>> Related to this thing another question: Is there already a debian way, to
>> force those new downloaded packages to install, when the system is being
>> shutdown by the user? (Similar like windows doe
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> David Parker wrote:
>>
>> I have confirmed that rpc.statd is running, which I believe is the port
>> mapper in newer distributions.
>
> AFAIK rpc.statd is not a portmapper replacement. The two portmapper
> equivalents that I am aware of are:
>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 9/20/2013 4:21 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Mi, 17 iul 13, 18:43:22, Gary Dale wrote:
>>>
>>> ifconfig can be used to both query and change the ip addresses of
>>> network interfaces on your machine. Used with no arguments, it lists
>>>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
>
> You missed to understand the irony :D. No, I'm kidding now. Indeed, Arch
> Linux forked Evolution, called the fork Evolution too and messed up
> quoting for Evolution. This is the policy of Arch Linux, to make broken
> forks of current stabl
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Bob Proulx a écrit :
>>
>> OT Rant: It annoys me that recent Linux kernels reverse the order of
>> the route lines. Previously it would have been scanned from top to
>> bottom and the first line matching wins. But now it is upside down
>> a
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Balamurugan wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 04:59 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> Catherine Gramze wrote:
>>>
>>> I intend to build a computer for the specific purpose of running
>>> Debian. I have had a bad experience with a store-bought computer,
>>> which seemed to be wholly u
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 21:47 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> I thought that Arch's policy was to package the latest vanilla
>> upstream versions.
>
> Correct!
So why are you claiming that they've forked Evolu
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/26/2013 5:45 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Stan Hoeppner
>> wrote:
>>> On 9/25/2013 12:52 PM, Catherine Gramze wrote:
>>
>> Stan, joking aside, are there any AMD processors you would recommend
>> for doing ke
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 08:11:31PM -0700, Dan Hitt wrote:
>>
>> This is regarding the question of what computer hardware to buy that
>> will work with debian, given that store-bought computers were a
>> problem this latest time.
>>
>> First, wha
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Regid Ichira wrote:
The following's what I've understood from #722604...
> In view of http://bugs.debian.org/722580 and
> http://bugs.debian.org/722604:
>
> A machine with:
> - a custom, non initrd, linux image
> - udev 175-7.2
> - no DEVTMPFS i
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Regid Ichira wrote:
>
> Now, considering that an initrd requires a lot more software, I
> think that an initrd should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.
"A lot more software"?! Installing initramfs-tools will just pull in
klibc-utils, libklibc, and busybox!
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Catherine Gramze wrote:
>
> I contacted MSI to ask if they made a motherboard I could use. Here is the
> exchange:
>
> Me: I want to purchase a motherboard for a Linux computer. I would prefer
> one that would accept the new Haswell processor. The BIOS must allow f
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Beco wrote:
> On 26 September 2013 22:22, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> (I've compiled a kernel on a netbook; you'd better have a few hours to
>> spare...)
>
> Questions for people who compile kernel and their machines:
>
> How
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Catherine Gramze wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Tom H wrote:
>> I'd call it obscure rather than magical.
> Any sufficiently obscure technique is indistinguishable from magic - (my
> apologies to Arthur C. Clark).
:)
>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 19:07 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> Traditional device names, such as /dev/sda, /dev/sdb,
>> (and therefore the partitions on those devices, such
>> as /dev/sda1, /dev/sdb1, etc.) are not assigned in a predictable
>>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 6:38 AM, David L. Craig wrote:
> On 13Sep26:2109-0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Balamurugan
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/25/2013 04:59 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>>> Catherine Gramze wrote:
>>>>>
>>>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 13:34 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Ralf Mardorf
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 19:07 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Traditional dev
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Main Backup wrote:
>
> I just want to ask two simple questions about debian future.
>
> 1. Will systemd default init system in future?
> 2. Why I just can't purge systemd-*** in my system now? I don't want it.
> I don't need it. I hate it by my all heart.
> If
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> I'll guess that you want one of the BSD variants or the Debian kFreeBSD
> variant as systemd is Linux only as I understand it.
And FreeBSD'll switch to launchd and Vadim'll switch to Windows 9. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Regid Ichira wrote:
> On Fri, Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:34:56 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 19:07 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Traditiona
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:02 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 14:27:19 -0400
> Tom H wrote:
>>
>> libsystemd-login0 is the replacement of consolekit (which has been
>> deprecated) and is used for tracking sessions. Using it doesn't mean
>> that you're usi
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Regid Ichira wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:06:43 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Regid Ichira wrote:
>>> On Fri, Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:34:56 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Ralf Mar
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I setup bridging on my system for kvm, but on restart of the host system
> (no guest VM's running) could not ping outside my local network.
>
> Bringing the bridge down corrected the problem, but I'm trying to
> understand what is going on,
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Ross Boylan
wrote:
>
> Arun made a suggestion that
>> Your 'physical' device eth0/eth2 or whatever needs to be added to the
bridge.
> I believe that is done by the /etc/kvm/kvm-ifup script that is executed
when I
> launch the virtual machine.
> It says, in part
>
>
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>
>> Arun made a suggestion that
>> > Your 'physical' device eth0/eth2 or whatever needs to be added to the
>> bridge.
>> I believe that is done by the /etc/kvm/kvm-ifup script that is executed
>> when I launch the virtual machine.
>
> I think tha
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Francesco Pietra wrote:
>
> Did you use a recent version of the installer? What I would like to know -
> before reinstalling everything on my servers - is whether the option to set
> grub on both disks of raid 0 has now been introduced.
No.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Francesco Pietra
> wrote:
>>
>> Did you use a recent version of the installer? What I would like to know -
>> before reinstalling everything on my servers - is whether the option to set
>&
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Francesco Pietra wrote:
>>
>> recall that it has been added with Wheezy. But let me put forward
>> that it doesn't really matter. If you have RAID then you know you
>> want grub on both disks. After installing simply run the grub install
>> script against both dis
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Ross Boylan
wrote:
> I removed network manager and have this in /etc/network/interaces:
>
> # eth2 managed by bridge and not otherwise mentioned
>
> auto br0
> iface br0 inet dhcp
>bridge_ports eth2
>
> That seems to work with the kvm-ifup script provided by w
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Francesco Pietra wrote:
>
> I hope not to bother beyond the limit, but the security of mirror raid is
> something of utmost importance, at least in my work of biochemist, with very
> limited ability in recovering from disk failures.
>
> I planned to use the double-
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:04 PM, james gray wrote:
>
> working with Debian 7.0
>
> working with the examples at
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/iptables
>
> when i write a example for a lo0 table as shown
>
> -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
>
> and follow procedure of
>
> iptables-restore < file-name
>
> i do
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Ross Boylan wrote:
>
> I have a fresh install of wheezy and am attempting to export some
> directories. It's not working, judging from showmount. I've tried
> various things and searched, but haven't found anything.
>
> I have not touched mounts.allow. Do I need
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Ross Boylan wrote:
>
> I was a little surprised to find that I needed to quote my variable
> definitions in /etc/default, at least for nfs-kernel-server.
> RPCMOUNTDOPTS="--manage-gids --no-nfs-version 4"
> works, but
> RPCMOUNTDOPTS=--manage-gids --no-nfs-version 4
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Ross Boylan
wrote:
>
> Thank you. I guess I didn't RTFM closely enough!
You're welcome.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debia
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Regid Ichira wrote:
>
> It seems newer hardware is much more problematic in this sense. I
> think MS ovecomes this difficulty by somehow attaching a signature for
> each device. I don't have the details, don't know the pros and cons.
On a UEFI box, partitions are a
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
> Florian Lindner writes:
>>
>> What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or
>> aptitude? Last time I read about it, it was aptitude, due to better
>> dependency checking. What is the current state? apt-get or aptitude?
>> D
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:19:30 -0700, David Guntner
>>
>> What things are logged where is controlled by the /etc/rsyslog.conf
>> file. "man rsyslog.conf" for more information about the layout of the
>> file.
>
> Here's an extract from the rsyslo
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> 1. Being on dialup, I use a purchased copy of the 10 DVD set for
> installation.
> My preseed.cfg is on a USB stick. I use the "Automated install" option.
> Pressing allows me to specify the file location. Of course it comes to
> a halt
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 16:47 +0300, Alex Moonshine wrote:
>>
>> I'm using MATE right now and it's good, but from the perspective
>> viewpoint, I'd stick with XFCE.
>
> MATE from upstream does conflict with other software. This isn't good,
> it
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
>> Have you considered NAS?
>
> No way!
What's wrong with NAS to elicit such a rejection?
> GVFS is absolutely optional software.
You only ever consider things from your limited use-case but upstream
developers and distribution maintainer
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
> Tom H writes:
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
>>> Florian Lindner writes:
>>>>
>>>> What is the prefered tool for installing on the CLI? apt-get or
>>>> apt
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:42:44 +0200, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> MATE can be installed alongside other DEs on Fedora so I'm not at all
>> convinced by this MATE-conflicts-with-"common-software" meme!
>> Soneon
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:14 PM, wrote:
> Le 11.10.2013 20:44, Tom H a écrit :
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf
>> wrote:
>>
>> You've also complained in this thread and previously about compliance
>> with green drives. I could've r
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:44:11 +0200, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf
>> wrote:
>>>> Have you considered NAS?
>>>
>>> No way!
>>
>> What's wrong
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2. I base my preseed.cfg on the example at
>>> http://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/example-preseed.txt . Near
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:55 PM, wrote:
> Le 12.10.2013 00:46, Tom H a écrit :
>>
>> Did you notice the "could've"?
>
> Ermm... no, sorry :) did not noticed :/
Pas de soucis! :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 18:43 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Ralf Mardorf
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:42:44 +0200, Tom H wrote:
>>>>
>>>> MATE can be installed
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:10 PM, msl09 wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
>> Tom H writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you filed a bug report about aptitude breaking apt (whatever
>>>>> that means!) or is this ju
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Jesse Molina wrote:
> On 10/12/13 8:22 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> Jesse Molina wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a Debian unstable host which successfully boots from the
>>> linux-image-3.10-1-amd64 kernel package. However, I recently installed the
>>> linux-image-3.10-3-am
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Richard Owlett
>> wrote:
>>> Tom H wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett
>>>> wrote:
>>>>&
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Richard Owlett
>> wrote:
>>> Tom H wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Richard Owlett
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Tom H
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Jesse Molina wrote:
> On 10/12/13 2:40 AM, Jesse Molina wrote:
>>
>> I have a Debian unstable host which successfully boots from the
>> linux-image-3.10-1-amd64 kernel package. However, I recently installed the
>> linux-image-3.10-3-amd64 kernel package, and it is
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:54:06PM +0400, recovery...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:46:40 +0200
>> Florian Lindner wrote:
>>>
>>> What is the minimum kernel version for the upcoming Jessie? Can I rely
>>> on that this does no cha
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
> Florian Lindner writes:
>>
>> I plan to use Debian on a virtual server where I can't control the
>> kernel version, that is 2.6.32.
>>
>> What is the minimum kernel version for the upcoming Jessie?
>
> I am using Jessie with the kernel fro
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:00 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:00:19 +0100
> Darac Marjal wrote:
>
>> This isn't really a safe assumption. There have been transitions in the
>> past (such as udev) where the dist-upgrade should be performed as:
>> * Update sources.list
>> * Install new kern
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Beco wrote:
> On 17 October 2013 19:24, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
>>
>> Using synaptic 0.75.13 in Wheezy under the menu item, "Settings,
>> Repositories," the updates tab lists, "Notify me of a new Ubuntu
>> version."
>>
>> What? Is someone developing for Debian but
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Beco wrote:
> On 17 October 2013 19:24, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
>>
>> Using synaptic 0.75.13 in Wheezy under the menu item, "Settings,
>> Repositories," the updates tab lists, "Notify me of a new Ubuntu
>> version."
>>
>> What? Is someone developing for Debian but
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Steffen Dettmer
wrote:
>
> I'd like to configure multiple IP addresses to a VLAN tagged interface. I
> tried
>
> auto eth3.107
> iface eth3.77 inet static
> address 10.0.5.15
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> iface eth3.77 inet static
> address 10.0.5.16
> ne
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to configure multiple IP addresses to a VLAN tagged
>> interface. I tried
>>
>> auto eth3.107
>> iface eth3.77 inet static
>> address 10.0.5.15
>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>> iface eth3.77 inet static
>
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Steffen Dettmer
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> works for me in the form of
>>
>> allow-auto eth0.9
>>
>> iface eth0.9 inet static
>> address 192.168.1.119
>> netmask 255.255.255.0
&g
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Steffen Dettmer
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> auto eth0
>>> iface eth0 inet static
>>> address 10.0.5.16
>>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>>> iface eth0
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Steffen Dettmer
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Tom H wrote:
> thanks again for your fast help.
You're welcome.
>> So Bob must be right about your ifupdown version not using iproute
>
> I'm using Wheezy with ifup versio
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Chris Davies wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>> iface eth3.77 inet static
>> address 10.0.5.15
>
>> iface eth3.77 inet static
>> address 10.0.5.16
>
> The Debian documentation at
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-refere
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to configure multiple IP addresses to a VLAN tagged interface. I
>> tried
>>
>> auto eth3.107
>>iface eth3.77 inet static
>>address 10.0.5.15
>>netmask 255.255.255.0
>>iface eth3.77 inet
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Miles Fidelman
>> wrote:
>>
>> eth0:1 is an alias.
>>
> ummm... no, eth0:1 is a virtual interface riding on top of a physical one
> (eth0 being th
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Steffen Dettmer
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>> I'm using Wheezy with ifup version 0.7.8, I think this is the
>>> latest officially released (aka "the best") one?
>>
>> Strange. I was
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Steffen Dettmer
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>> allow-auto eth0.9
>>> iface eth0.9 inet static
>>> address 192.168.1.119
>>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>>> gateway 192.168.1.1
>>
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Guy Marcenac wrote:
>
> I updated today my wheezy system.
> In the update there were both a grub and kernel updates.
> During install I got these messages
>
> Setting up grub-pc (1.99-27+deb7u2) ...
> /usr/sbin/grub-setup: warn: Attempting to install GRUB to a part
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 19.10.2013 09:52, schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>> On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 09:40 +0530, bhuvanesh kumar wrote:
>>>
>>> I recently upgraded my system from Debian testing to Unstable. After,
>>> upgrading i'm not able to login to my system
>>
>> If y
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
>>>
>>> allow-auto eth0.9
>>> iface eth0.9 inet static
>>> address 192.168.1.119
>>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>>> gateway 192.168.1.1
>>> post-up ip address add 192.168.1.199/24 dev eth0.9
>
> What I use is:
> -=-=-=-=-=-
> auto eth0
> ifa
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
>
> allow-auto eth0.9
> iface eth0.9 inet static
> address 192.168.1.119
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> gateway 192.168.1.1
> post-up ip address add 192.168.1.199/24 dev eth0.9
>>>
>>> What I use is:
>>> -=-=-=-=
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Jogi Hofmüller wrote:
> Am 2013-10-18 12:42, schrieb Jogi Hofmüller:
>> Am 2013-10-18 10:35, schrieb Jesse Molina:
>>>
>>> As previously noted, this was a bug in mdadm and has already been fixed
>>> in the current version. Just update your mdadm package and then
>>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:09 PM, anx_dev wrote:
>
> Since the change for pkexec, Synaptic cannot be started with a user
> with sudo privileges. This is _very_ cumbersome if you have to admin
> several machines with a central NIS for users and allowing only the
> user sitting on the machine to hav
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 20:34 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
>>
>> I have also had this problem for a while - I thought it was related to
>> Mate which I run.
>> gksudo will run it here...but pkexec will not.
>
> I don't know pkexec. Does it all
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Mark Phillips
wrote:
>
> I ran apt-get update and apt-get upgrade this morning on an old server
> (Debian Squeeze) and the system won't boot now. I get the error
>
> kernel panic not syncing: VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown -block(0,0)
>
> One of the updat
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
>
> I got very frustrated about Webkit (Midori uses Webkit). I found enormous
> number
> of bugs in CVE list, but most of them were related to products that use
> Webkit such
> as Google Chrome, I should determine if they originated from
101 - 200 of 1896 matches
Mail list logo
